Fortinet NSE6_FNC-7.2 Exam - Topic 2 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FNC-7.2 exam

Question #: 37
Topic #: 2

When configuring isolation networks in the configuration wizard, why does a Layer 3 network type allow for more than one DHCP scope for each isolation network type?

AThere can be more than one isolation network of each type.

BAny scopes beyond the first scope are used if the Initial scope runs out of IP addresses.

CConfiguring more than one DHCP scope allows for DHCP server redundancy.

DThe Layer 3 network type allows for one scope for each possible host status.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Luisa at May 02, 2025, 08:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FNC-7.2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Heike

2 months ago

I thought each network type only needed one scope.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyndia

2 months ago

Wait, can you really have multiple scopes? Sounds complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauryn

2 months ago

I agree, redundancy is key for DHCP!

upvoted 0 times

...

Brande

3 months ago

The first scope running out is a good point, but isn't that rare?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mignon

3 months ago

More than one isolation network is definitely a thing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theron

3 months ago

I vaguely remember that DHCP scopes can help with redundancy, but I'm not confident if that's the main reason for multiple scopes in Layer 3 networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ollie

3 months ago

I feel like the answer could be related to having more than one isolation network type, but I can't recall the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yan

4 months ago

I think I saw a similar question in our practice exam. It mentioned something about using additional scopes when the first one runs out of addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michell

4 months ago

I remember something about Layer 3 networks supporting multiple scopes, but I'm not sure why exactly. It might have to do with redundancy?

upvoted 0 times

...

Laila

4 months ago

Ah, I see now. The Layer 3 network type allows for more than one DHCP scope so that you can have redundancy and failover if one scope runs out of addresses. Smart design choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derrick

4 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the relationship between network types and DHCP scopes. I'll need to re-read the material on this to make sure I understand the reasoning behind the answer choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosio

4 months ago

I've got this! The Layer 3 network type allows for multiple DHCP scopes because you can have multiple isolation networks of the same type. That gives you more flexibility in IP address management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Velda

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. I think the key is understanding how the Layer 3 network type works and how that relates to DHCP scopes. I'll need to review that in my notes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnda

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the network configuration and DHCP scopes to figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vanda

9 months ago

I agree with Chana, C makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margart

9 months ago

Ah, a question about DHCP scopes! My favorite. I'm going with C, because who doesn't love a good dose of redundancy in their network configurations?

upvoted 0 times

Emiko

8 months ago

Definitely, it helps ensure that there are no disruptions in network services.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

8 months ago

I agree, having redundancy in DHCP servers is always a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Inocencia

9 months ago

You know, I was trying to think of a way to get more than one DHCP scope per isolation network, and the Layer 3 network type is the key. Option D seems to be the correct answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...