New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet NSE6_FNC-7.2 Exam - Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FNC-7.2 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All NSE6_FNC-7.2 Questions]

What would occur if both an unknown (rogue) device and a known (trusted) device simultaneously appeared on a port that is a member of the Forced Registration port group?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Renato at Sep 15, 2024, 11:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FNC-7.2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Arlean
3 months ago
I heard it generates an event too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
3 months ago
I disagree, it should just isolate them instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
Wait, both devices at once? That sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
4 months ago
Definitely option D! Makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
4 months ago
I think the port would be shut down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
4 months ago
I recall something about administratively shutting down the port in cases like this, but I’m not confident if that’s the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the Forced Registration port group. Does it mean that both devices would still have access to the VLAN?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
4 months ago
This scenario reminds me of a practice question where we discussed rogue devices. I feel like the port would be provisioned to isolate both hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
5 months ago
I think I remember that if both devices show up, the port might not be managed, but I'm not entirely sure if it generates an event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
5 months ago
I'm a bit stumped on this one. The options all seem plausible, but I'm not confident I can pick the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is understanding how the Forced Registration port group works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing, so I'll need to read it over a few times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
5 months ago
This question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think through the different scenarios carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
5 months ago
I've seen questions like this before. I think I know the right approach, but I'll double-check my understanding before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
1 year ago
Why do you think it's A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 year ago
Hold up, are we sure there's not a secret option E where the port explodes and we all get the day off? No? Darn, guess I'll have to settle for one of these boring choices then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
1 year ago
I don't know, man. Option A seems kinda sketchy to me. Letting both hosts have access to the VLAN? That's just asking for trouble. I'm going to have to pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 year ago
I'm going with option D. The port would be administratively shut down. Better safe than sorry, I always say! No unknown devices on my watch!
upvoted 0 times
Marsha
1 year ago
I think we should consult the network administrator to be sure of the correct action to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think option D is the safest bet. Shutting down the port is better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the correct choice. Both hosts would be isolated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
1 year ago
I think option A is more likely. Both hosts would have access to that VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
1 year ago
I'm sticking with option D. Shutting down the port is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
1 year ago
I agree with option B. An event would be generated if both devices appeared.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
1 year ago
I think option A is more likely. Both hosts would have access to that VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
1 year ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option B sounds like a reasonable approach too, where the port is not managed, and an event is generated. It's important to be proactive about unknown devices on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
1 year ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The port would be provisioned to the registration network, and both hosts would be isolated. This is the most logical response to protect the network from an unknown device.
upvoted 0 times
Dalene
1 year ago
True, it's better to err on the side of caution when dealing with unknown devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
1 year ago
I think in this case, isolating both hosts is the safer option to prevent any security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice to isolate both hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to provision the port for the normal state host?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel