Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FNC-7.2 Topic 1 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FNC-7.2 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 1
[All NSE6_FNC-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

If you are forcing the registration of unknown (rogue) hosts, and an unknown (rogue) host connects to a port on the switch, what occurs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Study Guide p. 356: Any time FortiNAC changes network access for an endpoint, the change is documented on the Port Changes view. This provides an administrator with valuable information when validating control configurations and enforcement.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lashaun
20 days ago
Option D, disabling the host? What is this, the Dark Ages? I want my switches to be smart, not heavy-handed. Give me that isolation VLAN any day - B is the way to go, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
26 days ago
Alright, let's see here... If it's an unknown host, I'd expect the switch to take some action to isolate it. So I'm going to go with B, the default isolation VLAN. Seems like the most logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
Jolene
2 days ago
I think the switch will move the host to a default isolation VLAN as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
4 days ago
I agree, isolating the unknown host in a default VLAN makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamie
28 days ago
Ha! Disabling the host? That's a bit extreme, don't you think? I'd go with B, moving the host to an isolation VLAN. Keeps things nice and secure without shutting down the connection entirely.
upvoted 0 times
Edgar
3 days ago
User1: Exactly, no need to completely disable the host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
17 days ago
User2: Definitely, it's a good balance between security and functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
18 days ago
User1: I agree, isolating the host seems like a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rasheeda
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I guess it depends on how the switch is configured. Maybe the host gets moved to a specific VLAN or maybe it gets disabled. I'll have to think about this one a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
Joanna
20 days ago
B) The host is moved to a default isolation VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
24 days ago
A) The host is moved to VLAN 111.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalia
2 months ago
The question seems straightforward. If an unknown host connects, it should be moved to an isolation VLAN, so I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Soledad
2 days ago
You're right, it's better to isolate than to disable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
25 days ago
I think that would be too extreme, just moving it to an isolation VLAN should be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
1 months ago
But what if the host is disabled instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
1 months ago
I agree, B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettyann
2 months ago
I think no VLAN change is performed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
2 months ago
I believe the host is moved to a default isolation VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
2 months ago
I think the host is moved to VLAN 111.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel