New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 Exam - Topic 5 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 5
[All FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 Questions]

Refer to the exhibits.

An administrator is testing application steering in SD-WAN. Before generating test traffic, the administrator collected the information shown in the first exhibit. After generating GoToMeeting test traffic, the administrator examined the corresponding traffic log on FortiAnalyzer, which is shown in the second exhibit.

The administrator noticed that the traffic matched the implicit SD-WAN rule, but they expected the traffic to match rule ID 1.

Which two reasons explain why some log messages show that the traffic matched the implicit SD-WAN rule? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Elly at Jul 31, 2025, 08:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jerilyn
2 months ago
I thought all apps were covered. Surprised to see this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
2 months ago
I agree, but B seems likely too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
2 months ago
I think it's definitely option A. SSL inspection is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
3 months ago
D makes sense; GoToMeeting might not have a specific rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? What if it's C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
3 months ago
I wonder if the lack of a configured SD-WAN rule for GoToMeeting could be the main reason. That seems to come up often in our studies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
3 months ago
I feel like the routing information refresh might be a factor too, but I can't recall the exact details on how that affects traffic matching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
4 months ago
I think the session 3-tuple matching is a common issue in similar practice questions. It could definitely be a reason for the implicit rule match.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
4 months ago
I remember something about SSL inspection being crucial for matching specific rules, but I'm not entirely sure if it applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
4 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The key seems to be figuring out why the traffic matched the implicit rule instead of the expected rule ID 1. I'll need to carefully consider the possible explanations provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
4 months ago
Oof, this one's got me a bit stumped. I'll need to really focus on understanding the exhibits and the details of the problem. Gotta make sure I don't miss any important clues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
4 months ago
Alright, time to put on my troubleshooting hat. The question is asking for two reasons, so I'll need to carefully analyze the options and select the two that best explain the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key information seems to be that the traffic matched the implicit SD-WAN rule, but the administrator expected it to match rule ID 1. I'll need to consider the possible reasons for this discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully examine the exhibits and think through the possible reasons why the traffic matched the implicit SD-WAN rule instead of the expected rule ID 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
5 months ago
Hmm, I think it's B and D. The traffic didn't match any existing ISDB cache entries, and there was no configured SD-WAN rule for GoToMeeting. Gotta love those collaboration apps, always throwing a wrench in the works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
7 months ago
I think the reason could be that full SSL inspection is not enabled on the matching firewall policy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel