Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4 Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 2
[All FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4 Questions]

Refer to Exhibit:

What does the data point at 21:20 indicate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The exhibit shows a graph that tracks two metrics over time: Receive Rate and Insert Rate. These two rates are crucial for understanding the log processing behavior in FortiAnalyzer.

Understanding Receive Rate and Insert Rate:

Receive Rate: This is the rate at which FortiAnalyzer is receiving logs from connected devices.

Insert Rate: This is the rate at which FortiAnalyzer is indexing (inserting) logs into its database for storage and analysis.

Data Point at 21:20:

At 21:20, the Insert Rate line is above the Receive Rate line, indicating that FortiAnalyzer is inserting logs into its database at a faster rate than it is receiving them. This situation suggests that FortiAnalyzer is able to keep up with the incoming logs and is possibly processing a backlog or temporarily received logs faster than new logs are coming in.

Option Analysis:

Option A - FortiAnalyzer is Indexing Logs Faster Than Logs are Being Received: This accurately describes the scenario at 21:20, where the Insert Rate exceeds the Receive Rate. This indicates that FortiAnalyzer is handling logs efficiently at that moment, with no backlog in processing.

Option B - The fortilogd Daemon is Ahead in Indexing by One Log: The data does not provide specific information about the fortilogd daemon's log count, only the rates. This option is incorrect.

Option C - SQL Database Requires a Rebuild: High receive lag would imply a backlog in receiving and indexing logs, typically visible if the Receive Rate were significantly above the Insert Rate, which is not the case here.

Option D - FortiAnalyzer is Temporarily Buffering Logs to Index Older Logs First: There is no indication of buffering in this scenario. Buffering would usually occur if the Receive Rate were higher than the Insert Rate, indicating that FortiAnalyzer is storing logs temporarily due to indexing lag.

Conclusion:

Correct Answe r : A. FortiAnalyzer is indexing logs faster than logs are being received.

The graph at 21:20 shows a higher Insert Rate than Receive Rate, indicating efficient log processing by FortiAnalyzer.


FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation on log processing metrics, Receive Rate, and Insert Rate indicators.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Celestina
2 days ago
I totally agree, B seems right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
8 days ago
Looks like the fortilogd daemon is just one log ahead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
13 days ago
I have a vague recollection of something about SQL database rebuilds, but I can't recall if that relates to this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
19 days ago
I'm leaning towards option A, but I feel like I need to double-check what "indexing faster" really means in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
24 days ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned buffering logs, so option D could be a possibility too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
1 month ago
I think the data point at 21:20 might suggest that the fortilogd daemon is ahead in indexing, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
1 month ago
Ah, I think I've got it! Based on the information in the graph and the answer choices, the data point at 21:20 indicates that FortiAnalyzer is temporarily buffering received logs so older logs can be indexed first. I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
1 month ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure what the graph is showing, but I'll give it my best shot. I'll carefully consider each answer choice and try to eliminate the ones that don't seem to fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 month ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. The graph shows some kind of indexing or logging activity over time. The question is asking what the data point at a specific time indicates. I'll need to analyze the choices and see which one best matches what I'm observing in the graph.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
1 month ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this graph. I'll need to study it closely and think through the different options to figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
1 month ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I'll carefully review the graph and the answer choices to determine what the data point at 21:20 indicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
9 months ago
Ah, the joys of log indexing! If only FortiAnalyzer could index logs as quickly as I can chug a cup of coffee.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
9 months ago
But could it be possible that FortiAnalyzer is temporarily buffering received logs so older logs can be indexed first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
9 months ago
Option C? Seriously? Rebuilding the SQL database? That's like trying to fix a flat tire with duct tape. Give me a break!
upvoted 0 times
Sophia
9 months ago
B) The fortilogd daemon is ahead in indexing by one log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
9 months ago
A) FortiAnalyzer is indexing logs faster than logs are being received.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elbert
10 months ago
Haha, looks like the fortilogd daemon is trying to play catch-up! Option B is the way to go, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
Dorcas
9 months ago
Option B makes sense, the fortilogd daemon is ahead in indexing by one log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
9 months ago
Yeah, it looks like it's trying to catch up with the logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
9 months ago
I agree, the fortilogd daemon seems to be behind in indexing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmira
10 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer. FortiAnalyzer must be temporarily buffering received logs so older logs can be indexed first. Makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Gerald
9 months ago
I'm not sure, but option C also sounds plausible, the SQL database requiring a rebuild because of high receive lag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, the fortilogd daemon being ahead in indexing by one log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
9 months ago
I think option A could also be a possibility, FortiAnalyzer indexing logs faster than logs are being received.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
9 months ago
I agree with you, option D seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe it shows that the fortilogd daemon is ahead in indexing by one log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
10 months ago
I think the data point at 21:20 indicates that FortiAnalyzer is indexing logs faster than logs are being received.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
10 months ago
The data point at 21:20 clearly shows that FortiAnalyzer is indexing logs faster than they are being received. This is the most logical explanation based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
Nieves
9 months ago
C) The SQL database requires a rebuild because of high receive lag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
10 months ago
B) The fortilogd daemon is ahead in indexing by one log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
10 months ago
A) FortiAnalyzer is indexing logs faster than logs are being received.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel