Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Forescout FSCP Exam - Topic 8 Question 8 Discussion

Irresolvable hosts would match the condition. When configuring policies, which of the following statements is true regarding this image?Select one:
A) Has no effect on irresolvable hosts
B) Generates a NOT condition in the sub-rule condition
C) Negates the criteria outside the property
D) Modifies the irresolvable condition to TRUE

Forescout FSCP Exam - Topic 8 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Forescout's FSCP exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 8
[All FSCP Questions]

Irresolvable hosts would match the condition. When configuring policies, which of the following statements is true regarding this image?

Select one:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Based on the image showing'Meets the following criteria'radio button selected (as opposed to 'Does not meet the following criteria'), the correct statement is:'Has no effect on irresolvable hosts'.

Understanding 'Meets the following criteria':

According to the Forescout policy configuration documentation:

When'Meets the following criteria'is selected:

Normal Evaluation- The condition is evaluated as written

No Negation- There is NO inversion of logic

Irresolvable Handling- Separate setting; the 'Meets' choice does NOT affect irresolvable handling

Irresolvable Hosts - Independent Setting:

According to the policy sub-rule advanced options documentation:

'The 'Meets the following criteria' radio button and the 'Evaluate irresolvable as' checkbox are independent settings.'

'Meets the following criteria'- Controls normal/negated evaluation

'Evaluate irresolvable as'- Controls how unresolvable properties are treated

The selection of 'Meets the following criteria' has no specific effect on how irresolvable hosts are handled.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B . Generates a NOT condition- 'Meets' does NOT generate NOT; it's the normal condition

C . Negates the criteria outside- 'Meets' does not negate anything; it's the affirmative option

D . Modifies irresolvable condition to TRUE- The 'Evaluate irresolvable as' setting controls that, not 'Meets'

Referenced Documentation:

Define policy scope

Forescout eyeSight policy sub-rule advanced options

Forescout Platform Policy Sub-Rule Advanced Options


by Lonna at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FSCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Janine
2 months ago
D could be a trick. Irresolvable hosts are tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
2 months ago
C seems right to me. It negates outside criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
3 months ago
I feel unsure about this one. Maybe A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
3 months ago
I think it's B. The NOT condition makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
3 months ago
Wait, are we really saying it modifies to TRUE? That’s wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
3 months ago
D) seems too extreme, can't be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
3 months ago
C) sounds plausible, but I'm not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
3 months ago
I disagree, I think B) is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
4 months ago
A) Has no effect on irresolvable hosts is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
4 months ago
Irresolvable hosts, huh? Sounds like a horror movie title to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
4 months ago
Irresolvable hosts? That's a new one. I'll just guess and go with A. Has no effect on irresolvable hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure, but I'm going to go with C. Negates the criteria outside the property.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
5 months ago
D. Modifies the irresolvable condition to TRUE seems like the correct answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
5 months ago
I think the answer is B. Generates a NOT condition in the sub-rule condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
5 months ago
I recall that modifying conditions can lead to different outcomes, but I can't remember if it applies to irresolvable hosts. Maybe option D is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the terms used in the options. Does "negates the criteria" mean it would change the outcome? I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
5 months ago
This question seems similar to one we did in practice about conditions and sub-rules. I feel like option B could be the right choice, but I need to double-check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
6 months ago
I think I remember that "irresolvable hosts" means they can't be matched to any known criteria, but I'm not sure how that affects the policies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
6 months ago
Alright, I'm feeling more confident now. I think option B is the correct answer, since the image shows a "NOT" condition in the sub-rule, which would negate the irresolvable hosts criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
6 months ago
I think I've got a strategy here. The key is to focus on how the policy configuration in the image would affect the "irresolvable hosts" condition. Let me think through each option carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. What exactly do they mean by "irresolvable hosts"? I'll need to make sure I understand that concept before I can choose the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
6 months ago
Okay, let me take a closer look at the image. It seems to be showing some kind of policy configuration, so I'll need to understand how that works to answer this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
7 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how the image relates to the question.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawn
11 days ago
C could be a possibility too, but I'm not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
16 days ago
I'm leaning towards B. It seems logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
2 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel