Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Finra Exam Series-6 Topic 10 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Finra's Series-6 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 10
[All Series-6 Questions]

The AGRO Mutual Fund invests in aggressive growth stocks of midcap corporations. The fund is running an advertisement on the radio that informs the listeners that AGRO earned a 22% return last year while the S&P 500 Index returned only 10%. The ad also contains information regarding how an interested investor can contain a fund prospectus.

Has AGRO violated any securities laws with this advertisement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Neither Class B nor Class C shares have front-end loads. Class B and Class C shares typically have higher 12b -1 fees, however, with Class C having the highest 12b-1 fees of the three classes.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Kristofer
2 months ago
Wait, did AGRO use the word 'only' when describing the S&P 500's return? That's a bit cheeky, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
13 days ago
D) Yes. AGRO is required to provide information on the specific investments it made to earn that 22% return, given that the return is unusually high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
18 days ago
C) Yes. Although AGRO provided the return on the S&P 500 as well as its own return, the S&P 500 Index is comprised of average risk stocks and is not an appropriate benchmark for AGRO to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
24 days ago
B) No. In addition to providing the listeners with its own return last year, AGRO appropriately provided the listeners with a benchmark return; thus there has been no violation of any laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 months ago
A) No. This would be considered a generic advertisement and not an offer to sell.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option A. It's just a generic advertisement, not an offer to sell, so I don't see any issues with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
2 months ago
Haha, option D is a bit too much, isn't it? AGRO isn't required to give a detailed breakdown of its investments, that would be overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
2 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. Option C seems more plausible to me. The S&P 500 is not an appropriate benchmark for an aggressive growth fund like AGRO.
upvoted 0 times
Lavina
6 days ago
I agree with you. Option C does make sense, but I can see how Option B could also be a valid argument.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
8 days ago
I think Option B is the correct choice. AGRO provided the listeners with its own return as well as a benchmark return, so there should be no violation of any laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
15 days ago
Option C seems more plausible to me. The S&P 500 is not an appropriate benchmark for an aggressive growth fund like AGRO.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roy
2 months ago
I think option B is correct. AGRO provided the listeners with its own return as well as a benchmark, which is a standard practice in the industry.
upvoted 0 times
Derick
1 months ago
I think the advertisement was informative and transparent. Option B is definitely the correct answer in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
2 months ago
It's important for investors to have that comparison with a benchmark like the S&P 500. AGRO did the right thing by including that information in their advertisement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
2 months ago
I agree, option B seems to be the right choice. AGRO did not violate any securities laws by providing both its return and a benchmark.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coleen
3 months ago
A) No. It's just a generic advertisement, no violation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
3 months ago
C) Yes. S&P 500 is not an appropriate benchmark for AGRO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
3 months ago
B) No. AGRO provided a benchmark return, so it's not a violation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel