Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks F5CAB5 Exam - Topic 2 Question 17 Discussion

Which two methods should the BIG-IP Administrator use to troubleshoot a pool member that has been markedDOWNby its health monitor? (Choose two answers)
B) Enable monitor logging for the pool member that isDOWN. and D) Collect a TCPdump packet capture for theDOWNpool member.
A) Review the BIG-IP routing table using netstat -rn to show all routes.
C) Review the pool and pool-member statistics table for error data.

F5 Networks F5CAB5 Exam - Topic 2 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's F5CAB5 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 2
[All F5CAB5 Questions]

Which two methods should the BIG-IP Administrator use to troubleshoot a pool member that has been markedDOWNby its health monitor? (Choose two answers)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

When a pool member is markedDOWN, it indicates that the configured health monitor is failing. The most effective troubleshooting approach is to focus on the monitor behavior and the actual traffic between BIG-IP and the pool member.

Enabling monitor logging (Option B)is a recommended first step. Monitor logging provides detailed information about why the health check is failing, such as timeouts, connection refusals, incorrect responses, or unexpected status codes. This directly correlates with BIG-IP troubleshooting best practices and allows administrators to confirm whether the failure is due to application behavior, incorrect monitor configuration, or network reachability.

Collecting a TCPdump packet capture (Option D)is also a highly effective method. A packet capture allows the administrator to verify whether the monitor probes are being sent, whether responses are received, and whether packets are being dropped, reset, or malformed. This is especially valuable when diagnosing firewall issues, SSL problems, or application-level failures.

Reviewing pool statistics (Option C) is useful for general monitoring but does not explainwhya health monitor is failing. Reviewing the routing table (Option A) is typically unnecessary unless there is evidence of a broader routing issue affecting multiple destinations.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters

Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!


Save Cancel