Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 303 Exam - Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

A BIG-IP Administrator needs to have a BIG-IP linked to two upstream switches for resilience of the external network. The network engineer who is going to configure the switch instructs the BIG-IP Administrator to configure interface binding with LACP. Which configuration should the administrator use?
D) A Trunk containing an interface connected to each switch.
A) A virtual server with an LACP profile and the switches' management IPs as pool members.
B) A virtual server with an LACP profile and the interfaces connected to the switches as pool members.
C) A Trunk listing the allowed VLAN IDs and MAC addresses configured on the switches.

F5 Networks 303 Exam - Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 303 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 4
[All 303 Questions]

A BIG-IP Administrator needs to have a BIG-IP linked to two upstream switches for resilience of the external network. The network engineer who is going to configure the switch instructs the BIG-IP Administrator to configure interface binding with LACP. Which configuration should the administrator use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Malika at Jun 11, 2025, 02:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 303 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Julio
9 months ago
Wait, are we really using LACP with management IPs? That sounds weird!
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
9 months ago
I think A is a better choice, but I'm not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
9 months ago
C seems off, you need the interfaces, not just VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
9 months ago
I agree with B, it just makes sense for LACP setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
10 months ago
Definitely B, that's the right way to bind interfaces with LACP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between trunks and virtual servers. I feel like option D could be a contender, but I’m leaning towards B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
10 months ago
I vaguely recall something about trunks and VLANs, but I can't remember if that's relevant here. Maybe option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
10 months ago
I think it might be option B because it mentions the interfaces connected to the switches, which sounds right for LACP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
10 months ago
I remember studying LACP configurations, but I'm not sure if the virtual server needs to have the switches' management IPs as pool members. That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The mention of LACP makes me think it's not a virtual server configuration, but I'm not entirely sure which of the options is correct. I'll need to review the LACP documentation to make sure I understand the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The key here is that we need to configure interface binding with LACP, so I'm guessing the answer is either B or D. I'm leaning towards B since it mentions using the interfaces connected to the switches as pool members, which seems more in line with the LACP requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The question mentions configuring interface binding with LACP, so I'm not sure if a virtual server is the right approach. Maybe I should double-check the LACP configuration options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
11 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is B - a virtual server with an LACP profile and the interfaces connected to the switches as pool members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
1 year ago
B is definitely the way to go. Those interfaces connected to the switches are the key to making this LACP setup work properly.
upvoted 0 times
Shawn
11 months ago
User 3: It's important to follow the network engineer's instructions to set up the configuration correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
1 year ago
User 2: Yes, having the interfaces connected to the switches as pool members will ensure resilience of the external network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, option B is the best choice for configuring interface binding with LACP.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Galen
1 year ago
Haha, these options are tripping me up. I'm just going to guess and hope for the best. Maybe I'll get lucky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
1 year ago
I'll go with D. A trunk with an interface to each switch seems like the logical choice for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
Billi
12 months ago
User 2: I agree, having the interfaces connected to the switches as pool members would ensure resilience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
12 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice for configuring interface binding with LACP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
1 year ago
User 2: I agree with you, Bea. Option B seems like the most appropriate configuration for resilience with LACP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
1 year ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice. It mentions using LACP profile with interfaces connected to the switches as pool members.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leota
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking C might be the way to go, but I could be wrong. Trunk with VLANs and MACs sounds like it could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer. Using the interfaces connected to the switches as pool members makes the most sense for configuring LACP.
upvoted 0 times
Estrella
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, using the interfaces connected to the switches as pool members is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 year ago
User 1: I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Refugia
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also work if the switches' management IPs are used as pool members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
1 year ago
I agree with Irma. Configuring the interfaces connected to the switches as pool members makes sense for resilience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
1 year ago
I think the administrator should use option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel