Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 301b Topic 7 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 7
[All 301b Questions]

A virtual server for a set of web services is constructed on an LTM device. The LTM Specialist has created an iRule and applied this iRule to the virtual server:

when HTTP_REQUEST {

switch [HTTP::uri] {

"/ws1/ws.jsp" {

log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to JSP Pool"

pool JSP

}

default { log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool"

pool NonJSP

}

}

}

However, the iRule is NOT behaving as expected. Below is a snapshot of the log:

/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool

/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool

/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool

/WS1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool

/ws1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool

/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool

/ws1/ws.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool

What should the LTM Specialist do to resolve this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Joanne
4 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D might also work by selecting the 'Process Case-Insensitivity' option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
7 days ago
I agree with Shawnda, using switch [string tolower [HTTP::uri]] should fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
11 days ago
I think the LTM Specialist should choose option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel