Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 4 Question 10 Discussion

-- Exhibit ---- Exhibit --Refer to the exhibits.A virtual server has been configured for SSL offload on a single-arm network. On average, the virtual server will be handling 100,000 connections, with a peak of 130,000 connections. Between the virtual server and the web servers there is a single reverse proxy to provide site caching. The proxy is configured to perform source IP persistence before contacting the web servers. The site is logging users out immediately after logging them in.What should the LTM Specialist do to resolve this issue?
B) Create an iRule to add client IP persistence to a SNAT pool member.
A) Add a source address persistence profile to the virtual server.
C) Change the virtual server server-side TCP profile to tcp-lan-optimized.
D) Configure the virtual server HTTP profile to insert an X-Forwarded-For header.

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 4 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 4
[All 301b Questions]

-- Exhibit --

-- Exhibit --

Refer to the exhibits.

A virtual server has been configured for SSL offload on a single-arm network. On average, the virtual server will be handling 100,000 connections, with a peak of 130,000 connections. Between the virtual server and the web servers there is a single reverse proxy to provide site caching. The proxy is configured to perform source IP persistence before contacting the web servers. The site is logging users out immediately after logging them in.

What should the LTM Specialist do to resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Ryan at May 03, 2022, 09:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301b Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jerilyn
9 months ago
100,000 connections? That's a lot to handle!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
9 months ago
I think adding the X-Forwarded-For header could help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not the TCP profile causing the logout?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
10 months ago
Definitely agree, source address persistence is key here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
10 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of session persistence issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
10 months ago
I vaguely recall something about the X-Forwarded-For header being important for tracking users. Option D sounds familiar, but I’m not certain it would fix the logout issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
10 months ago
I keep thinking about that iRule we practiced. Could it really help with client IP persistence? I’m leaning towards option B, but I’m not sure if it’s the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
11 months ago
This scenario feels similar to a practice question we did about session persistence issues. I think option A might be the best choice, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
11 months ago
I remember we discussed source IP persistence in class, but I'm not entirely sure if adding a profile to the virtual server is the right move here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
11 months ago
I've got this! The key is to use the given ratio of 7.5:1.5 to convert the intravenous dose to the oral equivalent. Then we can calculate the total daily dose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
11 months ago
Hmm, the question mentions "CustomerA" and "ios-device", so I'm thinking the xpath might involve those elements. I'll need to double-check the YANG exhibit to see the exact structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
11 months ago
This is a good one. I think the key is to take it step-by-step and make sure I understand each part of the process. Enabling the admission plugin, validating the control config, and then testing it with a pod deployment - that sounds like a solid plan. I'll need to be thorough, but I think I can do this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
11 months ago
I think the key here is to restrict access based on the device type. The question mentions that some computers are user-owned, so I'd go with option C - an Azure AD conditional access policy with client apps conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm wondering if one-hot encoding (option A) might be a better approach to capture the contextual similarities between words. I'll need to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel