Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 3 Question 58 Discussion

Posted by Willow on Sep 19, 2022 at 03:41 AM

An HA pair of LTM devices configured in Active-Standby mode stops responding to traffic and causes an outage. The Active device becomes Standby, but the partner device stays in Standby mode instead of taking over as Active. A reboot and restart of the services brings the LTM device to Active mode for a short time, but then it goes into Standby mode again.

Which two configuration components caused this condition? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: A, C

Get Premium 301b Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
VI
Vincent 12 months ago
Nah, I don't buy that. Must be something else at play.
ZO
Zona 12 months ago
System Fail-safe could also be a factor, for sure.
RO
Rory 12 months ago
Surprised the Standby didn't take over! What's going on?
XO
Xochitl 1 year ago
I think it's more about the Link down on Failover.
CH
Cherelle 1 year ago
Definitely looks like VLAN Fail-safe is a culprit here.
VI
Viva 1 year ago
I feel like Gateway Fail-safe might be involved as well. It’s tricky because I can’t recall the exact scenarios where it applies.
AL
Allene 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where Link down on Failover was the answer. It makes sense here too, but I'm not completely confident.
DA
Dalene 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think System Fail-safe could also be a factor. It seems like it could prevent the standby from taking over.
ER
Ernest 1 year ago
I remember studying VLAN Fail-safe and how it can impact the failover process. It might be related to this issue.
BE
Bette 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know the UiPath Robotic Enterprise Framework has different workflows, but I'm not sure which one is responsible for incrementing the TransactionNumber variable. I'll have to think this through.
LA
Laticia 1 year ago
Ah, I've seen questions like this before. The key is understanding the directionality of the APIs in a software-defined network. I think I've got this one figured out.
JO
Jose 1 year ago
Ah, this is a good one. I think the answer is probably B, where the libraries are assigned by the client application. That way, the stored processes don't have to worry about it.
TA
Tammara 1 year ago
Local alarm system sounds like it could be right, but what about auxiliary systems? They might also connect to emergency services.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel