Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 3 Question 58 Discussion

An HA pair of LTM devices configured in Active-Standby mode stops responding to traffic and causes an outage. The Active device becomes Standby, but the partner device stays in Standby mode instead of taking over as Active. A reboot and restart of the services brings the LTM device to Active mode for a short time, but then it goes into Standby mode again.Which two configuration components caused this condition? (Choose two.)
A) VLAN Fail-safe and C) Gateway Fail-safe
B) System Fail-safe
D) Switch Board Failure
E) Link down on Failover

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 3 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 3
[All 301b Questions]

An HA pair of LTM devices configured in Active-Standby mode stops responding to traffic and causes an outage. The Active device becomes Standby, but the partner device stays in Standby mode instead of taking over as Active. A reboot and restart of the services brings the LTM device to Active mode for a short time, but then it goes into Standby mode again.

Which two configuration components caused this condition? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Willow at Sep 19, 2022, 03:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301b Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vincent
10 months ago
Nah, I don't buy that. Must be something else at play.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
10 months ago
System Fail-safe could also be a factor, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
10 months ago
Surprised the Standby didn't take over! What's going on?
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
11 months ago
I think it's more about the Link down on Failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
11 months ago
Definitely looks like VLAN Fail-safe is a culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
11 months ago
I feel like Gateway Fail-safe might be involved as well. It’s tricky because I can’t recall the exact scenarios where it applies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where Link down on Failover was the answer. It makes sense here too, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think System Fail-safe could also be a factor. It seems like it could prevent the standby from taking over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
11 months ago
I remember studying VLAN Fail-safe and how it can impact the failover process. It might be related to this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know the UiPath Robotic Enterprise Framework has different workflows, but I'm not sure which one is responsible for incrementing the TransactionNumber variable. I'll have to think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
11 months ago
Ah, I've seen questions like this before. The key is understanding the directionality of the APIs in a software-defined network. I think I've got this one figured out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
11 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I think the answer is probably B, where the libraries are assigned by the client application. That way, the stored processes don't have to worry about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
11 months ago
Local alarm system sounds like it could be right, but what about auxiliary systems? They might also connect to emergency services.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel