New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 3 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 3
[All 301b Questions]

An LTM device pair is configured for failover and connection mirroring. The LTM devices are configured with virtual servers for HTTP, HTTPS with SSL offload, and SSH. An event occurs that causes a failover. HTTP and SSH sessions active at the time of failover remain active, but HTTPS sessions are dropped.

What is the root cause of this problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jesus
3 months ago
C seems unlikely. SNAT automap usually isn't the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
3 months ago
Wait, are you serious? I thought HTTPS sessions would stay active during failover!
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
4 months ago
Definitely A. If the SSL certs don't match, that could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
4 months ago
I disagree, it could be D. They might not have enabled mirroring for HTTPS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
4 months ago
I think it's B. Connection mirroring and clientssl profiles don't mix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because I think connection mirroring needs to be enabled for HTTPS, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
I feel like SNAT automap could be a factor, but I don't remember if it directly affects HTTPS sessions during failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
4 months ago
I think I saw a similar question where the SSL certificates were the issue, but I can't recall if that applies here since the sessions are dropping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
5 months ago
I remember studying that connection mirroring can sometimes have issues with SSL, but I'm not sure if it's specifically about clientssl profiles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
5 months ago
I've got a strategy for this. I'll focus on the specific server types mentioned in the question and think about which ones would not be discovered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the "isolated" option is the correct answer here. Keeping each tenant's jobs isolated from the others should prevent any blocking issues. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
5 months ago
Right, but I feel like I'm getting confused with how many child elements are allowed. I need to make sure "PostalCodeResponse" doesn't contain any children, just the postal code itself.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel