Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 301b Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 2
[All 301b Questions]

An LTM Specialist has been asked to configure a virtual server to distribute connections between a pool of two application servers with addresses 172.16.20.1 and 172.16.20.2. The application servers are listening on TCP ports 80 and 443. The application administrators have asked that clients be directed to the same node for both HTTP and HTTPS requests within the same session.

Virtual servers vs_http and vs_https have been created, listening on 1.2.3.100:80 and 1.2.3.100:443, respectively.

Which configuration option will result in the desired behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Vivienne
22 days ago
Ah, the joys of load balancing. I bet the application admins are just sitting back, sipping their coffee, and enjoying the show.
upvoted 0 times
Ressie
2 days ago
A) Create pool app_pool with members 172.16.20.1:any and 172.16.20.2:any Assign app_pool as the default pool for both vs_http and vs_https Disable port translation for vs_http and vs_https
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jani
26 days ago
Option D is looking good, but that SSL persistence profile just for the HTTP virtual server seems a bit odd. Why not apply it to both?
upvoted 0 times
Ethan
2 days ago
B) Create pool http_pool with members 172.16.20.1:80 and 172.16.20.2:80 Assign pool http_pool as the default pool for both vs_https and vs_https Disable port translation for vs_https Create an SSL persistence profile with 'match across virtual servers' enabled Assign the persistence profile to vs_http.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
7 days ago
A) Create pool app_pool with members 172.16.20.1:any and 172.16.20.2:any Assign app_pool as the default pool for both vs_http and vs_https Disable port translation for vs_http and vs_https
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
1 months ago
Ha! Option A is a classic case of 'set it and forget it'. Disable port translation for both HTTP and HTTPS? That's just asking for trouble down the line.
upvoted 0 times
Clarinda
2 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
3 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
8 days ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
23 days ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keshia
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about option B. Disabling port translation for HTTPS seems risky, and I'm not convinced the SSL persistence profile will work the way they want across both virtual servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
1 months ago
Option C looks like the way to go. Separate pools for HTTP and HTTPS, and a persistence profile that matches across services to keep the client on the same node. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D also looks like it could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
2 months ago
I agree with Isadora, option C seems to be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
2 months ago
I think option C is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel