-- Exhibit --

-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
A company uses a complex piece of client software that connects to one or more virtual servers (VS) hosted on an LTM device. The client software is experiencing issues. An LTM Specialist is tasked with finding the cause of the problem.
The LTM Specialist has the tcpdump extract and knows the client software has at least one connection to a VS on port 1990. However, when a tcpdump runs on the internal VLAN, there is no record of port 1990 in the tcpdump.
Why is there no record of port 1990 in the tcpdump?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 301b Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
25 comments · newest first
HA
Hailey
6 months ago
I doubt it's B. Well-known ports can still be used without restrictions.
FR
France
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. NAT could explain the missing records.
LA
Lawana
6 months ago
I feel like option C makes sense. PAT could be hiding the port.
BE
Bettina
6 months ago
I think it's option A. The LTM device might be dropping the connection.
LI
Lindsey
6 months ago
Definitely a connection drop, I’ve seen that happen before.
DO
Doyle
7 months ago
Port 1990 is not a well-known port, so that can't be it.
ED
Edna
7 months ago
Surprised there's no mention of PAT in the options!
TI
Tien
7 months ago
I think it’s more likely a NAT issue.
MA
Malinda
7 months ago
The tcpdump not showing port 1990 could mean the LTM is dropping it.
EL
Elli
7 months ago
I bet the LTM Specialist is scratching their head, trying to figure out where that port went.
JO
Joni
8 months ago
Haha, the LTM device is like a magician, making the port disappear!
WE
Werner
8 months ago
D) The LTM device performs a Network Address Translation (NAT).
IS
Isabelle
8 months ago
C) The LTM device performs a Port Address Translation (PAT).
EL
Elbert
9 months ago
I feel like the answer might be related to how the LTM handles traffic. Maybe it's dropping the connection or doing something with the addresses?
VA
Vashti
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between NAT and PAT. Could either of those be the reason for not seeing port 1990 in the tcpdump?
SO
Solange
9 months ago
I think I saw a similar question about tcpdump and port visibility in practice tests. If the port isn't showing, it might be because the LTM is dropping the connection, right?
WA
Walton
9 months ago
I remember studying NAT and PAT, but I'm not entirely sure how they apply here. Could it be that the LTM is using NAT?
EL
Ellen
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between NAT and PAT. I'll need to review those concepts before deciding on the answer.
MA
Margurite
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards C) Port Address Translation (PAT). That would explain why the original port 1990 isn't visible in the tcpdump.
LE
Lea
10 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The client software is connecting to a virtual server on port 1990, but that port isn't showing up in the tcpdump. The answer has to be related to address translation on the LTM device.
FR
Franchesca
10 months ago
Hmm, no record of port 1990 in the tcpdump? That's really puzzling. I'll have to consider if the LTM device is doing some kind of address translation.
MU
Murray
10 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the exhibit and think through the different translation options.
CA
Carline
4 months ago
What if the LTM just drops the connection? That could explain it too.
RE
Reiko
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards PAT. It makes sense with the connections.
AM
Amie
6 months ago
This is definitely tricky. I think NAT could be the reason.