New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 1 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 1
[All 301b Questions]

-- Exhibit --

-- Exhibit --

Refer to the exhibit.

Which profile could be removed or changed on this virtual server to reduce CPU load on the LTM device without increasing server side bandwidth usage?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Ressie at May 04, 2022, 06:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301b Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Skye
3 months ago
Optimized-caching might be a better option to change!
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
3 months ago
I’d say tcp is the least impactful to remove.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure that won't affect bandwidth?
upvoted 0 times
...
King
4 months ago
Totally agree, that one seems like a CPU hog!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
4 months ago
I think removing the httpcompression profile would help reduce CPU load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
4 months ago
I feel like HTTP compression could be a candidate to change, but I’m not confident it won’t affect bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where optimizing caching helped reduce load. Could that be relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about TCP profiles being less resource-intensive. Maybe that's an option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
5 months ago
I think we might want to consider removing the HTTP profile since it could be adding unnecessary overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key is to identify the issues that would arise from not thoroughly testing the edge cases and error handling in the code. I think I've got a good handle on this, so I'll select the three best answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options that seem relevant, but I'm not totally confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
5 months ago
I've got this! Equivalence partitioning is one of my strengths. I'll break down the specification, identify the key input parameters, and determine the corresponding input classes. Easy peasy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel