Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 8 Question 28 Discussion

An LTM Specialist reports that an application si no longer reachable after it has been upgraded.Nothing has been changed in the configuration on the LTM device.The logs indicates that health monitors to all servers have failed as shown:What should the LTM Specialist verify next?
B) That the custom receive string for the HTTP monitor has changed with the upgrade
A) That the TCP hand shake with the servers is stall completed using tcpdump
C) That the can still ping the servers from te BIG_ IP device.
D) That the firewall between the BIG-ip device and servers is still allowing HTTP

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 8 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 8
[All 301a Questions]

An LTM Specialist reports that an application si no longer reachable after it has been upgraded.

Nothing has been changed in the configuration on the LTM device.

The logs indicates that health monitors to all servers have failed as shown:

What should the LTM Specialist verify next?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The log shows that tcp detection is normal, but http detection is abnormal. So we should pay attention to the detection problem of http level


by Josephine at May 09, 2022, 11:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301a Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bonita
10 months ago
Can we still ping the servers? That’s a basic check!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
10 months ago
What if the custom receive string got messed up during the upgrade?
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
11 months ago
Isn't it odd that nothing changed on the LTM but the app is down?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
11 months ago
I think the TCP handshake is more critical to verify.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
11 months ago
Definitely check the firewall settings first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
11 months ago
I feel like pinging the servers could be a basic first step, but I'm not confident if that's the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think verifying the TCP handshake could help identify if there's a connectivity issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how health monitors can fail after an upgrade, so checking the custom receive string seems important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to check firewall settings. It might be worth looking into if the firewall is blocking traffic now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
11 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The key is to create a branching business process flow that can handle all the different scenarios. That way, the team members can just follow the same process every time, no matter the customer type or contract status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is A - Duplicate checks with the Customer Vendor Integration (CVI).
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
11 months ago
I think the answer is single sign-on because it relates to maintaining a user's security context across services. It sounds familiar from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
11 months ago
I think with a humped yield curve, if medium rates drop, it could lead to a flattening effect. But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel