An application is expected to maintain more than 100,000 concurrent TCP connections to a single pool member.
What is an appropriate SNAT configuration in this situation?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 301a Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
DA
Dalene
12 months ago
Not sure about that, seems like a lot of IPs needed!
BE
Belen
12 months ago
Wait, can one IP really handle only 65,535 connections?
MA
Maryanne
1 year ago
Definitely need more than one IP for that many connections!
CO
Cory
1 year ago
I think automap is enough for this.
CH
Chantell
1 year ago
A SNAT pool with 4 IPs sounds right.
KI
Kizzy
1 year ago
I vaguely remember that static SNATs aren't ideal for high connection counts, but I'm not confident about the specifics.
KA
Karina
1 year ago
I feel like a SNAT pool with multiple IPs is the way to go here, but I can't recall how many exactly we would need.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
I think I practiced a similar question where SNAT automap was mentioned, but I'm not sure if that's enough for 100,000 connections.
TA
Talia
1 year ago
I remember that a single IP can handle around 65,535 connections, so we definitely need more than one IP for this scenario.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not 100% sure about this one. Let me think through the different Kubernetes Service types.
CA
Casie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The table names seem similar, so I'll need to carefully read the descriptions to make sure I select the right ones.
SA
Samira
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Is "inherited delete" a real thing, or is that just a distractor option? I'll have to review my notes on database relationships to make sure I understand the correct terminology.