New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 6 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 6
[All 301a Questions]

An LTM Specialist needs to force only FTP traffic, sourced from subnet 10.10.10.0/24 to virtual server 10.10.20.1 to the new FTP1 server. The following virtual servers are configured on the LTM device:

Traffic sourced from 10.10.10/24 must use the specific pool member for load balancing.

Which configuration change is needed to meet the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

According to the VS matching order, first match the destination host IP, then match the destination port and finally match the source network segment. In the current network configuration, 10.10.10./24 access to 10.10.10.20.1 will hit MyVS2. If there is no error in the title, subnet 10.10.10.0 to virtual

Server 10.10.20.1 to the FTP1 server,'' Is to distribute all traffic from 10.10.10.1 to FTP1, then D That's right.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Chery
3 months ago
I think A is totally off base, we need port 21, not 80!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
3 months ago
Is it really necessary to create a new virtual server? Sounds excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
3 months ago
Wait, why not just go with B? Seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
4 months ago
I agree, C is the best choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
4 months ago
Option C seems right, FTP runs on port 21.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
4 months ago
I feel like option D could be a trap. It mentions MyVS2, but we need to ensure it's for the right traffic. I think we should stick with options that clearly state the source subnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we need a new virtual server or just modify an existing one. I think option A might be too broad since it mentions port 80.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to configure traffic based on source IPs. I feel like option B could work, but it doesn't specify the port.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
5 months ago
I think we need to focus on the correct port for FTP, which is 21. So, option C might be the right choice, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
5 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. The question mentions "virtual servers" but doesn't give us much detail on the existing configuration. I'd want to double-check the current setup before deciding on the best approach. Maybe option A or B could work, but I'd need more information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. We need to force FTP traffic from 10.10.10.0/24 to the FTP1 server, so I'm leaning towards option C. Creating a new virtual server on port 21 seems like the best way to isolate and control that specific traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Do we need to create a new virtual server, or can we just modify an existing one? I'm not sure if option B or D might work instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
5 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I think option C is the way to go - create a new virtual server specifically for FTP traffic from the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet and point it to the FTP1 server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
5 months ago
Taking pictures of the factory floor at each shift seems like it could be a good way to visually document the process, but I'm not sure if that's the "very best" approach. I'd want to combine that with some other methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards the Vulnerability Protection Profile. It's designed to protect against a wide range of threats, including drive-by-downloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the question. I'm not sure which migration methods are compatible with the Microsoft Deployment Toolkit. I'll need to review the material on that tool before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
5 months ago
Didn't we practice a question about scalability relating to managed deployments? I might be mixing it up, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
2 years ago
You're right, I overlooked that detail. Option A does seem like the most appropriate choice for ensuring only FTP traffic from the specified subnet goes to the new FTP1 server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
2 years ago
But the question specifically mentioned that traffic must use a specific pool member for load balancing, so option A makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards option B) Add FTP1 to the pool assigned to the MyVS4 virtual server, and remove all other pool members from the pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Create a new virtual server for traffic sourced from 10.10.10.0/24 on port 21 that is destined to 10.10.20.1/32, and create a new pool that has only the pool member FTP1 defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Create a new virtual server for traffic sourced from 10.10.10.0/24 on port 80 that is destined to 10.10.20.1/32, and create a new pool has only the pool member FTP1 defined.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel