New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 5 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 5
[All 301a Questions]

A virtual server is configured to handle https traffic. The clientssl profile is configured to use a2048-bit RSA key. Due to security requirements, is the LTM Specialist needs to use a 4096-bit RSA key in the future.

What two effects will this change have on the BIG-IP device? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Rima
4 months ago
C seems extreme, not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
4 months ago
Totally agree, higher key size means more CPU load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
4 months ago
Wait, does a 4096-bit key really decrease TPS that much?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
4 months ago
I think B is more likely than C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
4 months ago
A definitely increases CPU usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
5 months ago
I recall something about TLS renegotiation, but I don't think it directly relates to the key size change. I feel like options A and C might be the right choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question about key sizes and performance, and I think the increase in CPU usage is definitely a factor, but I'm not sure about the TPS decrease.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like increasing the key size might impact the transactions per second. Maybe options B or C could be correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
5 months ago
I remember studying how key sizes affect CPU usage, so I think option A makes sense since a 4096-bit key would require more processing power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The COBIT 2019 governance system design workflow is all about considering various design factors to develop a customized governance system. Option A seems to capture that best, so I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
5 months ago
I have a vague memory that the Service Perimeter Guard actually adds another layer of security, which makes me question if it might be "False."
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
5 months ago
I think the GatewayDiagnosticLog would be the best place to start. It should give me insights into any issues with the VPN gateway itself.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel