Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 301a Topic 2 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 2
[All 301a Questions]

An organization's development team creates an application to put behind the F5 LTM device. The application can be quite load intensive at first, and then evens out over time. The team's load balancing method needs to select a pool after taking into account the pool member's response over the time to avoid landing on a busy pool member.

Which of the following load balancing methods meets this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elza
5 days ago
I think A) Fastest (application) could be a good option too, as it considers the response time of the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
9 days ago
I'm not sure, but C) Dynamic (node) could also work in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
11 days ago
I agree with Denae, D) Observed (member) seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
23 days ago
Haha, I'm just imagining the developers trying to explain this to the non-tech folks. 'So, we need a load balancing method that can handle the highs and lows of our application's demands.' Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
Theron
5 days ago
A) Fastest (application)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zoila
28 days ago
Dynamic (node) seems like a good option too. It considers the current load on the node, which could help avoid busy pool members.
upvoted 0 times
Lillian
5 days ago
C) Dynamic (node)
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
19 days ago
B) Predictive (member)
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
21 days ago
A) Fastest (application)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denae
1 months ago
I think the answer is D) Observed (member).
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
1 months ago
I think Predictive (member) is the way to go. It takes into account the member's response over time, which sounds like exactly what the team needs.
upvoted 0 times
Zoila
11 days ago
Dynamic (node) might be a good choice too, as it takes into account the overall health of the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
22 days ago
I think Observed (member) could also work well in this situation, as it considers the member's response over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
29 days ago
I agree, Predictive (member) seems like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel