New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 2 Question 114 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 114
Topic #: 2
[All 301a Questions]

Which Standard Virtual Server settings should an LTM Specialist use to load balance across routed path of two different ISPs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Nicholle at Jul 08, 2025, 11:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301a Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jutta
2 months ago
I agree with A, it makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
2 months ago
Definitely not B, that would cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
2 months ago
I think option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
3 months ago
Wait, why would you disable address translation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
3 months ago
C seems too restrictive for ISPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
3 months ago
I vaguely remember that enabling port translation could help with routing, but I can't remember if address translation should be enabled or disabled in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought disabling both address and port translation would be the safest option, but I’m not entirely sure if that applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like both address and port translation being enabled could be the right choice, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
4 months ago
I think I remember that for load balancing across ISPs, we might need to enable address translation. But I'm not sure if port translation should be enabled too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards B as well. The translation settings need to preserve the client information to distribute traffic effectively across the ISP links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
4 months ago
The key here is that we need to maintain the original client IP and port information to properly load balance across the routed paths. So B is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
4 months ago
Okay, for load balancing across routed paths, I believe the answer is B - both address and port translation enabled. This allows the virtual server to properly handle the routing between the different ISPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to review my notes on virtual server settings and how they relate to multi-ISP configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different translation settings and how they impact load balancing across multiple ISPs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel