Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 2 Question 114 Discussion

Which Standard Virtual Server settings should an LTM Specialist use to load balance across routed path of two different ISPs?
B) both address and port translation enabled
A) address translation enabled and port translation disabled
C) both address and port translation disabled
D) address translation disabled and port translation enabled

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 2 Question 114 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 114
Topic #: 2
[All 301a Questions]

Which Standard Virtual Server settings should an LTM Specialist use to load balance across routed path of two different ISPs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Nicholle at Jul 08, 2025, 11:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301a Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jutta
8 months ago
I agree with A, it makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
9 months ago
Definitely not B, that would cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
9 months ago
I think option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
9 months ago
Wait, why would you disable address translation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
9 months ago
C seems too restrictive for ISPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
10 months ago
I vaguely remember that enabling port translation could help with routing, but I can't remember if address translation should be enabled or disabled in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought disabling both address and port translation would be the safest option, but I’m not entirely sure if that applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like both address and port translation being enabled could be the right choice, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
10 months ago
I think I remember that for load balancing across ISPs, we might need to enable address translation. But I'm not sure if port translation should be enabled too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards B as well. The translation settings need to preserve the client information to distribute traffic effectively across the ISP links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
11 months ago
The key here is that we need to maintain the original client IP and port information to properly load balance across the routed paths. So B is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
11 months ago
Okay, for load balancing across routed paths, I believe the answer is B - both address and port translation enabled. This allows the virtual server to properly handle the routing between the different ISPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to review my notes on virtual server settings and how they relate to multi-ISP configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different translation settings and how they impact load balancing across multiple ISPs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel