MENU
Four members in a server pool have similar hardware platforms. An LTM Specialist needs the load balancing method that can select the server with the fewest entries in the persistence table.
Which load balancing method should the LTM Specialist use?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 301a Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Pay attention to the examination questions, the stem is to ask the session to keep the minimum entries in the table.
35 comments · newest first
LA
Lashandra
10 months ago
Definitely Least Sessions, it’s the most efficient!
MA
Markus
10 months ago
Wait, isn't it supposed to be Dynamic Ratio?
OW
Owen
10 months ago
I think Least Connections might be better, though.
EL
Ellen
11 months ago
I’m surprised there’s even a debate about this!
OD
Odelia
11 months ago
Least Sessions is the way to go!
MA
Maile
11 months ago
I feel like I saw a question where Least Connections was mentioned as the best option for balancing, but I think it might not be the correct one here.
KE
Keshia
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused between Least Sessions and Least Connections. I know they both deal with session counts, but I can't recall which one is tied to the persistence table.
NG
Nguyet
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I believe Least Sessions is the right choice since it specifically looks at the persistence table entries.
LO
Lorenza
12 months ago
I think the method we're looking for is the one that focuses on the number of active sessions, but I'm not entirely sure if it's Least Sessions or Least Connections.
MA
Malcom
12 months ago
I'm pretty confident Least Sessions is the right answer here. That should give us the server with the fewest active sessions and thus the smallest persistence table.
RO
Roxanne
1 year ago
Least Connections seems like it could work, but I'm not sure if that's the best option for minimizing the persistence table entries.
ME
Melita
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on how the persistence table factors into this. I'll need to review that concept before deciding.
LA
Lashawn
1 year ago
Okay, the key here is selecting the method that can pick the server with the fewest entries in the persistence table. I think Least Sessions might be the way to go.
NO
Noah
1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the persistence table and how each load balancing method might impact it.
CR
Craig
1 year ago
I'm feeling Least Sessions. Easy to remember, and it just makes sense.
GR
Graciela
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Least Connections for this situation.
DA
Dalene
1 year ago
I think Observed might be a better choice for this scenario.
JI
Jina
1 year ago
I agree, Least Sessions is the way to go.
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
Least Connections? More like Least Brainpower required to figure this out.
AL
Alisha
1 year ago
Dynamic Ratio? That's a bit overkill for this scenario, don't you think?
LA
Lashandra
1 year ago
Least Sessions sounds like the way to go. Less overhead and faster response times.
AR
Ardella
1 year ago
D) Least Connections
SO
Sommer
1 year ago
C) Least Sessions
JE
Jesusita
1 year ago
B) Dynamic Ratio
MU
Muriel
1 year ago
A) Observed
AR
Art
2 years ago
I would go with Dynamic Ratio, as it dynamically adjusts the ratio based on server performance.
MA
Man
2 years ago
I agree with Launa, because it selects the server with the fewest entries in the persistence table.
MI
Minna
2 years ago
Hmm, I'd go with Least Connections. Keeps the load balanced and easy to manage.
VA
Vashti
1 year ago
I still think Least Connections is the most efficient choice.
SA
Samira
1 year ago
Dynamic Ratio could also be a good option to consider.
GE
Gerald
1 year ago
I think Observed might work better in this case.
HY
Hyun
1 year ago
I agree, Least Connections is the way to go.
MA
Marge
1 year ago
Yeah, it's a reliable method for balancing the load.
VA
Val
1 year ago
I agree, Least Connections is the way to go.
LA
Launa
2 years ago
I think the LTM Specialist should use Least Sessions.