Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 2 Question 110 Discussion

Four members in a server pool have similar hardware platforms. An LTM Specialist needs the load balancing method that can select the server with the fewest entries in the persistence table.Which load balancing method should the LTM Specialist use?
C) Least Sessions
A) Observed
B) Dynamic Ratio
D) Leas Connections

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 2 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 110
Topic #: 2
[All 301a Questions]

Four members in a server pool have similar hardware platforms. An LTM Specialist needs the load balancing method that can select the server with the fewest entries in the persistence table.

Which load balancing method should the LTM Specialist use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Pay attention to the examination questions, the stem is to ask the session to keep the minimum entries in the table.


by Kaycee at Apr 08, 2025, 10:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301a Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lashandra
7 months ago
Definitely Least Sessions, it’s the most efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
7 months ago
Wait, isn't it supposed to be Dynamic Ratio?
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
7 months ago
I think Least Connections might be better, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellen
8 months ago
I’m surprised there’s even a debate about this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
8 months ago
Least Sessions is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
8 months ago
I feel like I saw a question where Least Connections was mentioned as the best option for balancing, but I think it might not be the correct one here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused between Least Sessions and Least Connections. I know they both deal with session counts, but I can't recall which one is tied to the persistence table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
9 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I believe Least Sessions is the right choice since it specifically looks at the persistence table entries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
9 months ago
I think the method we're looking for is the one that focuses on the number of active sessions, but I'm not entirely sure if it's Least Sessions or Least Connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
9 months ago
I'm pretty confident Least Sessions is the right answer here. That should give us the server with the fewest active sessions and thus the smallest persistence table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
9 months ago
Least Connections seems like it could work, but I'm not sure if that's the best option for minimizing the persistence table entries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on how the persistence table factors into this. I'll need to review that concept before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
9 months ago
Okay, the key here is selecting the method that can pick the server with the fewest entries in the persistence table. I think Least Sessions might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
10 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the persistence table and how each load balancing method might impact it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
1 year ago
I'm feeling Least Sessions. Easy to remember, and it just makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Graciela
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Least Connections for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 year ago
I think Observed might be a better choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
1 year ago
I agree, Least Sessions is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
Least Connections? More like Least Brainpower required to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
1 year ago
Dynamic Ratio? That's a bit overkill for this scenario, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
1 year ago
Least Sessions sounds like the way to go. Less overhead and faster response times.
upvoted 0 times
Ardella
1 year ago
D) Least Connections
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
1 year ago
C) Least Sessions
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
1 year ago
B) Dynamic Ratio
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
1 year ago
A) Observed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Art
1 year ago
I would go with Dynamic Ratio, as it dynamically adjusts the ratio based on server performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
1 year ago
I agree with Launa, because it selects the server with the fewest entries in the persistence table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd go with Least Connections. Keeps the load balanced and easy to manage.
upvoted 0 times
Vashti
1 year ago
I still think Least Connections is the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 year ago
Dynamic Ratio could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
1 year ago
I think Observed might work better in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
1 year ago
I agree, Least Connections is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
1 year ago
Yeah, it's a reliable method for balancing the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
1 year ago
I agree, Least Connections is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Launa
1 year ago
I think the LTM Specialist should use Least Sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel