MENU
An LTM Specialist needs to load balance an application using an LTM device to meet the requirements:
The application servers do NOT Support SSL, but client access to the application should be secured.
Multiple requests from the same client should be sent to the same pool member.
All pool members will have roughly the same processing power, and traffic should be distributed evenly.
The LTM device is NOT the pool members' default gateway.
which configuration should the LTM Specialist.
Suggested Answer: A, C
Get Premium 301a Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
It is required that cookie persist must be used and http profile must be used, and SSL offloading must also be required. It must be in standard mode, excluding BD E.
33 comments · newest first
RU
Rusty
11 months ago
Wait, can we really secure it without SSL on the servers?
JO
Josephine
11 months ago
D looks good, but why not just stick with A?
BR
Brandon
11 months ago
C has too many profiles for this setup, right?
RE
Renato
12 months ago
I think B is better for SSL handling.
CO
Colette
12 months ago
Option A seems solid with cookie persistence.
YU
Yuette
12 months ago
I believe we need to use SNAT to ensure the pool members can respond correctly, but I'm not sure which persistence method is best for this scenario.
PA
Paola
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where cookie persistence was used, but I can't remember if it was with a performance or standard virtual server.
VA
Vallie
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about the difference between performance and standard virtual servers. I think performance might be better for load balancing, but I can't recall the specifics.
BA
Barrie
1 year ago
I remember that SSL termination is important here since the application servers don't support SSL, so I think we need to focus on the Client SSL profile options.
AD
Adolph
1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll go with option C - a performance L4 virtual server with a SNAT, HTTP profile, Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence. That should meet all the requirements.
TI
Tish
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the requirement that the LTM device is not the pool members' default gateway. I'll need to make sure I understand how that impacts the configuration.
SH
Shanda
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. I'll need to use a performance L4 virtual server with a Client SSL profile to secure the client connection, and then use cookie persistence to ensure multiple requests from the same client go to the same pool member.
CO
Cory
1 year ago
Hmm, the requirement to secure client access while the application servers don't support SSL is interesting. I'll need to consider how to handle that.
LA
Lashandra
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think about the best configuration to meet them.
ER
Erinn
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the LTM Specialist is like, 'Seriously, why are there so many SSL profiles to choose from?' Option C sounds like the most comprehensive solution.
KA
Kallie
1 year ago
Yeah, the LTM Specialist must have to carefully consider all the options to ensure the best configuration for the application.
CA
Cassi
1 year ago
I agree, it covers all the necessary components for securing the application and balancing the traffic.
VI
Viva
1 year ago
Option C does seem like the most comprehensive choice.
YA
Yan
1 year ago
Wait, why are we even considering a performance virtual server? Isn't a standard one more than enough for this scenario? I'd go with option D.
ST
Stefan
1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I'd say option D is the correct answer. A standard virtual server with the right profiles and persistence should do the trick.
AL
Alesia
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option C. The combination of SNAT, HTTP profile, Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence seems to address all the requirements elegantly.
GA
Gail
1 year ago
Yes, option C with SNAT, HTTP profile, Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence should work well.
SH
Shannon
1 year ago
I think option C is the best fit for the scenario described.
LY
Lynsey
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most comprehensive solution for the requirements.
CL
Claribel
1 year ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. It covers all the necessary configurations.
RO
Rozella
2 years ago
Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. Securing the client access with a Client SSL profile while maintaining session persistence with Source Address persistence seems to fit the requirements best.
DO
Dorthy
1 year ago
That makes sense. Option B it is then for balancing the application load and securing client access.
VI
Vince
1 year ago
I see your point, but I think option B is more efficient in this scenario since the application servers do not support SSL.
GI
Gilberto
1 year ago
But what about using option C with SNAT, HTTP profile, Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence? Wouldn't that provide more comprehensive security?
CR
Cruz
1 year ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice for securing client access and maintaining session persistence.
MI
Miles
2 years ago
I see your point, but I still think option A is the best choice because it meets all the requirements mentioned in the question.
AL
Alexia
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) A performance L4 virtual server with a SNAT, HTTP profile, Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence.
MI
Miles
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) a performance 14 virtual server with a SNAT and cookie persistence.