Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 2 Question 106 Discussion

An LTM Specialist needs to load balance an application using an LTM device to meet the requirements:The application servers do NOT Support SSL, but client access to the application should be secured.Multiple requests from the same client should be sent to the same pool member.All pool members will have roughly the same processing power, and traffic should be distributed evenly.The LTM device is NOT the pool members' default gateway.which configuration should the LTM Specialist.
A) a performance 14 virtual server with a SNAT and cookie persistence and C) A performance L4 virtual server with a SNAT, HTTP profile. Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence
B) a performance L4 virtual server with a Client SSL profile and Source Address persistence
D) A standard virtual server with a SNAT, HTTP profile Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence
E) A standard virtual server with a SNAT, HTTP profile, Client profile, andd cookie persistance.

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 2 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 2
[All 301a Questions]

An LTM Specialist needs to load balance an application using an LTM device to meet the requirements:

The application servers do NOT Support SSL, but client access to the application should be secured.

Multiple requests from the same client should be sent to the same pool member.

All pool members will have roughly the same processing power, and traffic should be distributed evenly.

The LTM device is NOT the pool members' default gateway.

which configuration should the LTM Specialist.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

It is required that cookie persist must be used and http profile must be used, and SSL offloading must also be required. It must be in standard mode, excluding BD E.


by Adela at Jan 22, 2025, 08:08 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301a Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rusty
8 months ago
Wait, can we really secure it without SSL on the servers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
8 months ago
D looks good, but why not just stick with A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
8 months ago
C has too many profiles for this setup, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
9 months ago
I think B is better for SSL handling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
9 months ago
Option A seems solid with cookie persistence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
9 months ago
I believe we need to use SNAT to ensure the pool members can respond correctly, but I'm not sure which persistence method is best for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where cookie persistence was used, but I can't remember if it was with a performance or standard virtual server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
9 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the difference between performance and standard virtual servers. I think performance might be better for load balancing, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
9 months ago
I remember that SSL termination is important here since the application servers don't support SSL, so I think we need to focus on the Client SSL profile options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
9 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll go with option C - a performance L4 virtual server with a SNAT, HTTP profile, Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence. That should meet all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the requirement that the LTM device is not the pool members' default gateway. I'll need to make sure I understand how that impacts the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. I'll need to use a performance L4 virtual server with a Client SSL profile to secure the client connection, and then use cookie persistence to ensure multiple requests from the same client go to the same pool member.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
9 months ago
Hmm, the requirement to secure client access while the application servers don't support SSL is interesting. I'll need to consider how to handle that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
10 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think about the best configuration to meet them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the LTM Specialist is like, 'Seriously, why are there so many SSL profiles to choose from?' Option C sounds like the most comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
Kallie
1 year ago
Yeah, the LTM Specialist must have to carefully consider all the options to ensure the best configuration for the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
1 year ago
I agree, it covers all the necessary components for securing the application and balancing the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
1 year ago
Option C does seem like the most comprehensive choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yan
1 year ago
Wait, why are we even considering a performance virtual server? Isn't a standard one more than enough for this scenario? I'd go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I'd say option D is the correct answer. A standard virtual server with the right profiles and persistence should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option C. The combination of SNAT, HTTP profile, Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence seems to address all the requirements elegantly.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
1 year ago
Yes, option C with SNAT, HTTP profile, Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence should work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
1 year ago
I think option C is the best fit for the scenario described.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most comprehensive solution for the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 year ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. It covers all the necessary configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rozella
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. Securing the client access with a Client SSL profile while maintaining session persistence with Source Address persistence seems to fit the requirements best.
upvoted 0 times
Dorthy
1 year ago
That makes sense. Option B it is then for balancing the application load and securing client access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
1 year ago
I see your point, but I think option B is more efficient in this scenario since the application servers do not support SSL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
1 year ago
But what about using option C with SNAT, HTTP profile, Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence? Wouldn't that provide more comprehensive security?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
1 year ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice for securing client access and maintaining session persistence.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Miles
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think option A is the best choice because it meets all the requirements mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) A performance L4 virtual server with a SNAT, HTTP profile, Server SSL profile, and cookie persistence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) a performance 14 virtual server with a SNAT and cookie persistence.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel