Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 10 Question 30 Discussion

AN LTM Specialist needs to determine the delay between an LTM device and the internal web server for a specific client.Which two AVR reporting options should the LTM Specialist enable to measure the delay? (Choose two.)
D) Server latency and E) Client IP The problem is to specify the server delay of the client
A) User agents
B) Methods
C) Response codes

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 10 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 10
[All 301a Questions]

AN LTM Specialist needs to determine the delay between an LTM device and the internal web server for a specific client.

Which two AVR reporting options should the LTM Specialist enable to measure the delay? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Clay
8 months ago
Totally agree with D, it’s essential for latency checks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
9 months ago
Wait, can you really get accurate delay info from those options?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
9 months ago
D is a must, but I’m not sure about C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
9 months ago
I think A and E could be useful too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
9 months ago
Definitely go with D and C for measuring delay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
9 months ago
I definitely remember that server latency is key, but I’m torn between methods and response codes for the second choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
9 months ago
I feel like user agents could be useful, but I can't recall if they directly relate to measuring delay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
9 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think response codes might be relevant, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
9 months ago
I think we need to focus on server latency for sure, but I'm not entirely sure about the second option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
9 months ago
The decimal precision point is an interesting detail. I wonder if that's a common best practice for these kinds of integrations, or if it's specific to this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
9 months ago
The part about different client architectures using the same OS version is tripping me up. I'll need to think that through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know modules need to have a Link type, but I'm not sure if all of these options are actually valid Link types. I'll have to think about this one a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
10 months ago
I think we went over a similar question in practice. It seems like write-level access might be necessary for its full functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel