MENU
AN LTM Specialist needs to determine the delay between an LTM device and the internal web server for a specific client.
Which two AVR reporting options should the LTM Specialist enable to measure the delay? (Choose two.)
Suggested Answer: D, E
Get Premium 301a Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
CL
Clay
12 months ago
Totally agree with D, it’s essential for latency checks!
DE
Delmy
12 months ago
Wait, can you really get accurate delay info from those options?
MA
Marla
1 year ago
D is a must, but I’m not sure about C.
KE
Keena
1 year ago
I think A and E could be useful too!
FE
Felicidad
1 year ago
Definitely go with D and C for measuring delay.
RI
Rickie
1 year ago
I definitely remember that server latency is key, but I’m torn between methods and response codes for the second choice.
EL
Elvera
1 year ago
I feel like user agents could be useful, but I can't recall if they directly relate to measuring delay.
LA
Lachelle
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think response codes might be relevant, but I'm not completely confident.
GA
Gary
1 year ago
I think we need to focus on server latency for sure, but I'm not entirely sure about the second option.
AN
Annmarie
1 year ago
The decimal precision point is an interesting detail. I wonder if that's a common best practice for these kinds of integrations, or if it's specific to this use case.
DA
Daniela
1 year ago
The part about different client architectures using the same OS version is tripping me up. I'll need to think that through.
MA
Mariann
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know modules need to have a Link type, but I'm not sure if all of these options are actually valid Link types. I'll have to think about this one a bit more.
IN
India
1 year ago
I think we went over a similar question in practice. It seems like write-level access might be necessary for its full functionality.