Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks Exam 201 Topic 8 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 8
[All 201 Questions]

A node is a member of various pools and hosts different web applications. If a web application is unavailable, the BIG-IP appliance needs to mark the pool member down for that application pool. What should a BIG-IP Administrator deploy at the pool level to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nelida at Nov 21, 2023, 07:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Dottie
3 months ago
I don't know, but I'm sure the correct answer involves a lot of acronyms and technical jargon. Just the way I like it!
upvoted 0 times
Krissy
2 months ago
User 3: Maybe it's a combination of ICMP + TCP monitor, option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
2 months ago
User 2: I believe it's D) A TCP monitor with a custom interval/timeout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
2 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is C) An HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tarra
3 months ago
Option A is a bit strange. Using a UDP monitor for a web application? That's like using a carrier pigeon to check your email.
upvoted 0 times
Jestine
2 months ago
User 3: It's like using a carrier pigeon to check your email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, using a UDP monitor for a web application seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
2 months ago
User 1: I think option A is a bit strange.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carrol
3 months ago
I'm going with B. A combination of ICMP and TCP monitors can check both the network connectivity and the application-level availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
3 months ago
D sounds good to me. A TCP monitor with a custom interval and timeout should be able to detect if the pool member is down.
upvoted 0 times
Pete
2 months ago
User 4: Let's go with option D then, it seems like the most reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
2 months ago
User 3: That makes sense, it would be able to detect if the pool member is down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
3 months ago
User 2: I agree, a TCP monitor with custom settings should work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
3 months ago
User 1: I think D is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eugene
4 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. An HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings can check the availability of the web application directly.
upvoted 0 times
Yasuko
3 months ago
User 2: I agree, an HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings can directly check the availability of the web application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
3 months ago
User 1: I think C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
3 months ago
I think D could also work, a TCP monitor with custom settings could do the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
3 months ago
I agree, C seems like the best option to monitor the web application availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonard
4 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think D) A TCP monitor with a custom interval/timeout could also work to mark the pool member down if the web application is unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
4 months ago
I agree with Susy. An HTTP monitor would be able to check if the web application is available by sending specific requests and receiving expected responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) An HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel