Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 201 Exam - Topic 8 Question 77 Discussion

A node is a member of various pools and hosts different web applications. If a web application is unavailable, the BIG-IP appliance needs to mark the pool member down for that application pool. What should a BIG-IP Administrator deploy at the pool level to accomplish this?
C) An HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings
A) A UDP monitor with a custom interval/timeout
B) A combination of ICMP + TCP monitor
D) A TCP monitor with a custom interval/timeout

F5 Networks 201 Exam - Topic 8 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 8
[All 201 Questions]

A node is a member of various pools and hosts different web applications. If a web application is unavailable, the BIG-IP appliance needs to mark the pool member down for that application pool. What should a BIG-IP Administrator deploy at the pool level to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nelida at Nov 21, 2023, 07:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dominque
10 months ago
Not sure about that... what if the app uses non-HTTP protocols?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
10 months ago
I agree, HTTP monitor is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
10 months ago
Wait, why would you use UDP? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
10 months ago
I think a TCP monitor could work too, but not ideal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
10 months ago
Definitely need an HTTP monitor for web apps.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
10 months ago
I think the HTTP monitor is the way to go, especially with custom send/receive strings. That seems to fit the requirement for web apps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
11 months ago
I feel like the combination of ICMP and TCP could be useful, but I don't recall if that's the best for marking down a pool member.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
11 months ago
I remember practicing with TCP monitors, but I'm not convinced they would catch application-level issues. Could an HTTP monitor be better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
11 months ago
I think we might need an HTTP monitor since it specifically checks web applications, right? But I'm not entirely sure about the custom strings part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking for a monitor at the pool level, so that rules out ICMP and TCP monitors since those are typically used at the node level. I think the best option here is a TCP monitor with a custom interval and timeout to check the web application's availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know we need to use a monitor, but I'm not sure which type would be best. I'm thinking maybe an HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings could work, but I'm not 100% confident that's the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about monitoring pool members on a BIG-IP appliance. I think the key is to understand the requirements - we need to mark a pool member down if the web application is unavailable, so we'll need a monitor that can detect that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know we need to use a monitor, but I'm not sure if a UDP monitor would be the right choice. Wouldn't that be more for monitoring a UDP-based service? I'm leaning towards the TCP monitor, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards the 50/50 split option. That way she gets some of the upside potential of the stock, while also locking in a guaranteed return from the CD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. DNS, DHCP, ALM S, and AD - which one is actually responsible for IP address assignment? I'll have to review my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 year ago
I don't know, but I'm sure the correct answer involves a lot of acronyms and technical jargon. Just the way I like it!
upvoted 0 times
Krissy
1 year ago
User 3: Maybe it's a combination of ICMP + TCP monitor, option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
1 year ago
User 2: I believe it's D) A TCP monitor with a custom interval/timeout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is C) An HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tarra
1 year ago
Option A is a bit strange. Using a UDP monitor for a web application? That's like using a carrier pigeon to check your email.
upvoted 0 times
Jestine
1 year ago
User 3: It's like using a carrier pigeon to check your email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, using a UDP monitor for a web application seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
1 year ago
User 1: I think option A is a bit strange.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carrol
1 year ago
I'm going with B. A combination of ICMP and TCP monitors can check both the network connectivity and the application-level availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 year ago
D sounds good to me. A TCP monitor with a custom interval and timeout should be able to detect if the pool member is down.
upvoted 0 times
Pete
1 year ago
User 4: Let's go with option D then, it seems like the most reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
1 year ago
User 3: That makes sense, it would be able to detect if the pool member is down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, a TCP monitor with custom settings should work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
1 year ago
User 1: I think D is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eugene
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer. An HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings can check the availability of the web application directly.
upvoted 0 times
Yasuko
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, an HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings can directly check the availability of the web application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
1 year ago
User 1: I think C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
1 year ago
I think D could also work, a TCP monitor with custom settings could do the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 year ago
I agree, C seems like the best option to monitor the web application availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonard
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. I think D) A TCP monitor with a custom interval/timeout could also work to mark the pool member down if the web application is unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
1 year ago
I agree with Susy. An HTTP monitor would be able to check if the web application is available by sending specific requests and receiving expected responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C) An HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel