Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 201 Exam - Topic 8 Question 125 Discussion

The BIG-IP Administrator disable all pool members in a pool Users are still able to reach the poolmembers.What is allowing users to continue to reach the disabled poo! members?
B) A persistence profile on the Virtual Server
A) A slow to time on Pool
C) A slow ramp time on virtual Server
D) A persistence profile on the Pool

F5 Networks 201 Exam - Topic 8 Question 125 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 125
Topic #: 8
[All 201 Questions]

The BIG-IP Administrator disable all pool members in a pool Users are still able to reach the pool

members.

What is allowing users to continue to reach the disabled poo! members?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Glory at May 08, 2026, 01:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dorthy
4 hours ago
I think it's B. The persistence profile keeps connections alive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
5 days ago
Yeah, B covers the persistence aspect. Makes it clear why users can still access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
11 days ago
I’m with you, B is the strongest answer. It explains the behavior well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
16 days ago
I doubt C. B is definitely the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
21 days ago
I feel like C could be a factor too. Slow ramp time might help users stay connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
26 days ago
But if the pool members are disabled, how does that work? B seems more logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
1 month ago
I’m leaning towards A. Maybe the timeout is just too long?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
1 month ago
Agreed, B makes sense. Users stay connected to the same pool member.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
1 month ago
I think it's B. The persistence profile keeps the sessions active.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
2 months ago
Wait, so even disabled members can still handle traffic? That's wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
2 months ago
Totally agree, persistence profiles can keep sessions alive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
2 months ago
No way, how can users still reach them if they're disabled?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tora
2 months ago
I thought it was the ramp time on the virtual server!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
2 months ago
It's definitely the persistence profile on the Virtual Server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
2 months ago
I remember that persistence profiles can maintain user sessions, but I’m not clear if it’s the one on the virtual server or the pool that matters here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the options. I feel like the slow ramp time could be a factor, but I can't recall the specifics of how it works in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
4 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where we discussed how session persistence can keep connections alive even if the pool members are down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
4 months ago
I think I remember something about persistence profiles affecting how users are routed, but I'm not entirely sure if it's related to the pool or the virtual server.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel