New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 201 Exam - Topic 4 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 4
[All 201 Questions]

A 816-IP Administrator recently deployed an application Users are experiencing slow performance with

the application on some remote networks.

Which two modifications can the BIG-IP Administrator make to address this issue? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Haley at May 23, 2024, 12:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nathan
3 months ago
I agree, B and C seem like the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
3 months ago
Surprised no one mentioned E, it could be useful!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
3 months ago
B is a solid choice, but C? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
4 months ago
I think A and D could help too, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
4 months ago
Definitely go with B and C for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between the f5-tcp-wan and f5-tcp-lan profiles. Wouldn't the WAN profile be more suitable for remote networks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I leaned towards the f5-tcp-wan profile as a good choice for remote users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
4 months ago
I think applying a destination address profile might be useful, but I can't recall exactly how it impacts performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how applying the f5-tcp-wan profile could help with slow performance on remote networks, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
5 months ago
Hmm, the f5-tcp-lan profile is for local area networks, so that's probably not the best choice here. I'm leaning towards the f5-tcp-wan profile as well, but I'll double-check the details to make sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
5 months ago
Based on the question, I think the f5-tcp-wan profile is the way to go. It's designed for optimizing TCP performance over wide area networks, which should help address the slow performance on remote networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options. Applying a source_addr profile doesn't seem relevant to the issue of slow performance on remote networks. I'll need to review the differences between the TCP profiles more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Applying a dest addr profile could help with routing, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here. Maybe the f5-tcp-wan profile would be a better fit?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different TCP profile options and how they might impact performance on remote networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key is to use the right command to temporarily increase the cap to 100M. I'll review the options closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at now. The key is to look for an option that will automatically discover and include new resources in the backup, rather than having to manually configure everything. I think one of the radio button options mentions something about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
5 months ago
Ah, good point. And I'll also double-check that the Optimize Schedule field is set to Yes. That could be an easy oversight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused—could a placing be the same as selling shares through a stock exchange? That might be option C, but I doubt that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
10 months ago
Maybe the users are just really, really far away from the server, like on the moon or something. In that case, the admin should just install a catapult to launch the data packets there faster.
upvoted 0 times
Olen
8 months ago
A: Maybe we should also consider applying the dest addr profile to the Virtual Server for better optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
9 months ago
B: Yeah, that could definitely help with the slow performance on remote networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
9 months ago
A: I think applying the f5-tcp-wan profile to the Virtual Server could help improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jutta
10 months ago
A) Applying a dest addr profile? Isn't that like trying to put out a fire with gasoline? I'm sticking with B) and C) for this one.
upvoted 0 times
Janey
9 months ago
Let's go ahead and make those modifications to the Virtual Server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
9 months ago
I agree, those profiles should help improve performance on remote networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
9 months ago
I think B) Apply f5-tcp-wan profile and C) Apply f5-tcp-lan profile are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shakira
10 months ago
E) fasti_4 profile? Sounds like some kind of exotic spice blend, not a network configuration. I'll have to pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Tiffiny
9 months ago
Merilyn: Good point, let's give those a try before considering the fasti_4 profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that could definitely improve things. Maybe also applying the dest addr profile could make a difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
9 months ago
User 1: I think applying the f5-tcp-wan profile might help with the slow performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marti
10 months ago
I'm not sure about the profiles, but maybe checking the dest addr profile could also be a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
10 months ago
I agree with Krissy, but also applying f5-tcp-lan profile might improve the performance on remote networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
11 months ago
I'm not sure about D) - applying a source_addr profile doesn't seem relevant to the problem at hand. Maybe the question is trying to trick us?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
11 months ago
B) and C) seem like the most logical choices to address the slow performance on remote networks. The f5-tcp-wan and f5-tcp-lan profiles are designed for optimizing TCP traffic over WAN and LAN connections, respectively.
upvoted 0 times
Armanda
9 months ago
Hopefully applying those profiles will improve the performance for users on remote networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
10 months ago
I agree, those profiles are specifically designed to optimize traffic over WAN and LAN connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
10 months ago
C) Apply f5-tcp-lan profile to the Virtual Server
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
10 months ago
B) Apply f5-tcp-wan profile to the Virtual Server
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krissy
11 months ago
I think applying f5-tcp-wan profile could help with the slow performance issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel