New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 201 Exam - Topic 4 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 4
[All 201 Questions]

A BIG-IP device has only LTM and ASM modules provisioned. Both have nominal provisioning level. The BI6-IP Administrator wants to dedicate more resources to the LTM module. The ASM module must remain enabled. Which tmsh command should the BIG-IP Administrator execute to obtain the desired result?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Herminia at Nov 19, 2024, 08:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gilma
3 months ago
No way, I thought you had to disable ASM first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
3 months ago
I think it's option B, sounds right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
3 months ago
Wait, can you really change provisioning like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
4 months ago
Definitely agree, LTM needs more resources!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
4 months ago
The command should be to modify LTM, not ASM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
4 months ago
I remember that the ASM module needs to stay enabled, so I think we should avoid anything that sets it to "none." That makes me lean towards option B or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
4 months ago
I feel like the command to increase LTM resources is "modify /sys provision Itm level dedicated," but I could be mixing it up with another command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to change provisioning levels, and I think "modify /sys provision asm level none" might be the right choice, but I'm not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
5 months ago
I think I remember that to allocate more resources to LTM, we might need to adjust the provisioning levels, but I'm not sure which command to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording of the question is a bit tricky, and I'm not entirely sure about the implications of the different provisioning levels. I'll need to double-check the documentation to make sure I understand the options before committing to an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
I'm confident that the answer is B. The question clearly states that the ASM module must remain enabled, so setting the ASM level to minimum or none wouldn't work. Dedicating more resources to the LTM module while keeping ASM enabled seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. We need to dedicate more resources to the LTM module, but the ASM module must remain enabled. That means we can't set the ASM level to none. I'm leaning towards option B as the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question says the ASM module must remain enabled, but option C says to set the ASM level to none. I'm not sure if that's the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the answer is B, since we need to dedicate more resources to the LTM module while keeping the ASM module enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
9 months ago
Wait, did they just say 'nominal provisioning level'? I'm sorry, but that sounds like something straight out of a corporate buzzword bingo game.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
10 months ago
Option B is the right choice, but I bet the real challenge is remembering all these weird abbreviations. Who comes up with these names anyway?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
10 months ago
Hmm, this question is a bit tricky. I'm leaning towards option B, but I'll need to double-check the syntax to make sure it's the correct command.
upvoted 0 times
Twana
8 months ago
C) modify /sys provision asm level none
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
9 months ago
I think you're right, option B seems like the correct command to dedicate more resources to the LTM module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
9 months ago
A) modify /sys provision Itm level dedicated
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rex
10 months ago
I'm not sure why the question mentions the ASM module must remain enabled. Wouldn't option C be the simplest solution?
upvoted 0 times
Vincenza
8 months ago
A: Then maybe option D would be the best choice to dedicate more resources to the LTM module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
9 months ago
B: Yeah, we need to keep the ASM module enabled, so option C wouldn't work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
10 months ago
A: I think option C would disable the ASM module completely.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolande
10 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go. Dedicating more resources to LTM while keeping ASM enabled seems to be the requirement here.
upvoted 0 times
Rosio
8 months ago
No, we need to keep ASM enabled, so option B is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
8 months ago
C) modify /sys provision asm level none
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
8 months ago
That makes sense, focusing on LTM while still keeping ASM enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
9 months ago
B) modify /sys provision ltm level dedicated
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissa
11 months ago
But if the ASM module must remain enabled, then option A makes more sense. It allows more resources to be dedicated to LTM while keeping ASM enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) modify /sys provision ltm level dedicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) modify /sys provision asm level minimum.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel