Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks Exam 201 Topic 2 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 2
[All 201 Questions]

A set of servers is used for an FTP application as well as an HTTP website via separate BIG-IP Pools. The

server support team reports that some servers are receiving a lot more traffic than others.

Which Load Balancing Method should the BIG-IP Administrator apply to even out the connection count?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tresa at Apr 14, 2024, 05:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rueben
13 days ago
Load balancing, huh? I'm just hoping the BIG-IP admin doesn't go for the 'Big Ingest Heavily' method. That might be a bit too much for the servers to handle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
16 days ago
Least Connections (Member) seems like the best option to me. Gotta keep those servers working hard, but not too hard, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 months ago
Hmm, I think Least Connections (Node) is the way to go. It'll look at the total number of connections on each node, not just the members.
upvoted 0 times
Della
2 days ago
I think Ratio (Node) might work too, but I still prefer Least Connections (Node) for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
13 days ago
But what about using Ratio (Node)? Wouldn't that also help balance the connection count?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
15 days ago
Yeah, that method will definitely help balance out the connection count across all the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
26 days ago
I agree, Least Connections (Node) seems like the best option to evenly distribute the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
28 days ago
I agree, Least Connections (Node) seems like the best option to evenly distribute the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brynn
2 months ago
I'm going with Ratio (Node). It'll assign connections based on the weight of each node, which should help balance the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I guess it depends on the specific requirements of the application and servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
Definitely Least Connections (Member). It'll distribute the load based on the number of active connections for each member, ensuring even distribution.
upvoted 0 times
Brynn
20 days ago
Exactly, it's a smart way to ensure all servers are handling a similar amount of traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
21 days ago
That way, the servers with more traffic will receive fewer new connections until the load evens out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 months ago
It makes sense to distribute the load based on the number of active connections for each server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
1 months ago
I agree, Least Connections (Member) is the best option for balancing the connection count.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharika
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Ratio (Member). It will balance the load based on the ratio of connections allowed to each server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) Least Connections (Member). It will distribute the load evenly among servers based on the number of active connections.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel