New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 201 Exam - Topic 2 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 2
[All 201 Questions]

A set of servers is used for an FTP application as well as an HTTP website via separate BIG-IP Pools. The

server support team reports that some servers are receiving a lot more traffic than others.

Which Load Balancing Method should the BIG-IP Administrator apply to even out the connection count?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tresa at Apr 14, 2024, 05:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kathrine
3 months ago
Isn't it surprising that some servers are getting way more traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
3 months ago
I've seen Ratio (Member) used effectively in similar setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure Least Connections (Node) won't overload some servers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
4 months ago
I disagree, Ratio (Node) could work better for balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
4 months ago
Least Connections (Member) seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
4 months ago
I remember discussing how Least Connections (Node) could help with uneven traffic, but I'm not confident if that's the best option for FTP and HTTP applications together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
4 months ago
I feel like Ratio methods are more about distributing traffic based on predefined weights, but I can't recall if that's what we need for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between Least Connections and Ratio methods, and I think Least Connections (Member) might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
5 months ago
I think I remember that the Least Connections method is often used to balance traffic more evenly, but I'm not sure if it's for members or nodes in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about Least Connections (Member). That seems like the most straightforward solution to balance the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between Member and Node. I'll need to review those concepts before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
5 months ago
Ratio could work too, but I'm not sure if that's the best option for this specific scenario. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. We want to even out the connection count, so I'm thinking Least Connections might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the load balancing methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
5 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The question is asking for a way to run containerized apps without installing them on the session hosts. That means we need a solution that can package and deliver the apps in a containerized format, like MSIX app packages. I'm confident that's the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to make sure I follow the steps in the right order to successfully roll back the file. I better review the options a few times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
5 months ago
Remote desktop could work, but that assumes the server is still accessible over the network. If the network is down, that might not be an option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
Option D with Deployment Manager and Ansible could work well too. That way, I can leverage the power of both tools to set up the instance group and handle the package dependencies. I'll have to research the best way to integrate them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
9 months ago
Load balancing, huh? I'm just hoping the BIG-IP admin doesn't go for the 'Big Ingest Heavily' method. That might be a bit too much for the servers to handle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
9 months ago
Least Connections (Member) seems like the best option to me. Gotta keep those servers working hard, but not too hard, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Tomoko
8 months ago
D: Sounds good, let's implement it and see how it goes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
8 months ago
C: Let's go with that method to evenly distribute the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
8 months ago
B: Agreed, we need to balance out the connection count.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
9 months ago
A: I think Least Connections (Member) is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
10 months ago
Hmm, I think Least Connections (Node) is the way to go. It'll look at the total number of connections on each node, not just the members.
upvoted 0 times
Tora
9 months ago
Let's go with Least Connections (Node) then. It seems like the most reliable choice for balancing the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
9 months ago
I think Ratio (Node) might work too, but I still prefer Least Connections (Node) for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
9 months ago
But what about using Ratio (Node)? Wouldn't that also help balance the connection count?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
9 months ago
Yeah, that method will definitely help balance out the connection count across all the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
10 months ago
I agree, Least Connections (Node) seems like the best option to evenly distribute the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
10 months ago
I agree, Least Connections (Node) seems like the best option to evenly distribute the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brynn
10 months ago
I'm going with Ratio (Node). It'll assign connections based on the weight of each node, which should help balance the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
11 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I guess it depends on the specific requirements of the application and servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
11 months ago
Definitely Least Connections (Member). It'll distribute the load based on the number of active connections for each member, ensuring even distribution.
upvoted 0 times
Brynn
10 months ago
Exactly, it's a smart way to ensure all servers are handling a similar amount of traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
10 months ago
That way, the servers with more traffic will receive fewer new connections until the load evens out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
10 months ago
It makes sense to distribute the load based on the number of active connections for each server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
10 months ago
I agree, Least Connections (Member) is the best option for balancing the connection count.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharika
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Ratio (Member). It will balance the load based on the ratio of connections allowed to each server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) Least Connections (Member). It will distribute the load evenly among servers based on the number of active connections.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel