New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 201 Exam - Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 2
[All 201 Questions]

A BIG-IP Administrator finds the following log entry:

tnm tmm[7141]: 011e0002:4: sweeperjjpdate: aggressive mode activated.

Which action should the BIG-IP Administrator to mitigate this memory issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Shenika at Dec 10, 2023, 08:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Melissa
3 months ago
Nah, I don't think connection mirroring will fix this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
3 months ago
I’m surprised they even have aggressive mode activated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
3 months ago
Wait, isn't option C also a valid choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
4 months ago
Totally agree, lowering the timeout helps with memory issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
4 months ago
I think option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
4 months ago
I vaguely remember that configuring the redundant pair to be active-active might help with load balancing, but I’m not sure if it relates to the memory problem here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D about Connection Mirroring, but I’m not entirely confident if that’s the right approach for a memory issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like adjusting the TCP profile timeout could help, but I can't recall if it should be increased or decreased.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
5 months ago
I remember something about aggressive mode indicating a memory issue, but I'm not sure which option directly addresses that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
5 months ago
Alright, let's do this. Based on the information provided, I'm leaning towards increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value as the best way to mitigate the memory issue. But I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking what action the BIG-IP Administrator should take, so I'll need to evaluate each of the answer choices and see which one seems most likely to address the memory problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
5 months ago
The log entry mentions "sweeperjjpdate: aggressive mode activated", so I'm thinking the solution might involve adjusting some TCP profile settings to mitigate the memory issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a memory issue with the BIG-IP system. I'll need to carefully read the log entry and the answer choices to determine the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The log entry doesn't provide a lot of context, and the answer choices don't seem directly related to the issue. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
5 months ago
I think the answer is A. Assigning a Preferred status Resource Preference to the Account seems like the most straightforward way to ensure the same technician services the customer when possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
5 months ago
I've seen this type of question before, and I think the key is to look for the correct namespace or package prefix. Based on that, I'm going to go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
5 months ago
Okay, the key details seem to be that the app works when connecting directly to the servers, but not through the virtual server. That points to an issue with the load balancing configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
9 months ago
Aggressive mode activated, huh? Sounds like the BIG-IP is channeling its inner Bruce Lee. Maybe we should just let it do its thing and see what happens. Or, you know, go with C and keep it chill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
10 months ago
Increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value? Sounds like a recipe for a BIG-IP nap time. But hey, if it works, I'm all for it. C is my pick.
upvoted 0 times
Salena
8 months ago
Let's go with option C then, increase the TCP profile idle Timeout value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
8 months ago
I agree, it could give the system more time to handle connections before timing out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
9 months ago
I think increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value might help with the memory issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lewis
10 months ago
Ah, the dreaded sweeperjjpdate. I bet the BIG-IP Administrator is sweeping the floor with this one. C is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
10 months ago
Wow, that's a tricky one. Aggressive mode activated? Sounds like a job for the BIG-IP Ninja! I'm going with C, just to keep things calm and collected.
upvoted 0 times
Nicolette
9 months ago
User 3: Let's hope it works and keeps things running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
9 months ago
User 2: Agreed, that sounds like a good plan to mitigate the memory issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
9 months ago
User 1: I think we should go with option C to increase the TCP profile ide Timeout value.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Galen
10 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. Increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value should help mitigate the memory issue. After all, we don't want our BIG-IP to be a TCP speed demon, right?
upvoted 0 times
Barb
9 months ago
B: Yeah, that makes sense. We don't want our BIG-IP to be too aggressive with memory usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
9 months ago
A: I think the answer is C. Increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value should help mitigate the memory issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
10 months ago
B: Yeah, that makes sense. We don't want our BIG-IP to be too aggressive with memory usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
10 months ago
A: I think the answer is C. Increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value should help mitigate the memory issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
11 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. Increasing the timeout value could help mitigate the memory issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) increase the TCP profile ide Timeout value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) Decrease the TCP profile ide Timeout value.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel