Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks Exam 201 Topic 1 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 1
[All 201 Questions]

An LTM device has a virtual server mapped to www5f.com with a pool assigned. The objects are defined

as follows:

Virtual server. Destination 192.168.245.100.443 netmask 255.255.255.0

Persistence: Source address persistence netmask 255.0.0.0

SNAT:AutoMap

Profiles: HnP/TCP

How should the BIG-IP Administrator modify the persistence profile so that each unique IP address

creates a persistence record?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tasia at Feb 05, 2023, 04:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Blondell
3 months ago
I'm going to go with B) netmask 255.255.255.255. It seems like the most logical choice to create a unique persistence record for each IP address.
upvoted 0 times
Blossom
2 months ago
User3: Yes, I also believe that option B) is the right one to create a unique persistence record for each IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
2 months ago
User2: I agree, that option seems to be the most logical for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
3 months ago
User1: I think B) netmask 255.255.255.255 is the correct choice for unique persistence records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Danilo
3 months ago
Haha, D) netmask 255.256.255.0? That's a pretty funny answer option. I'm pretty sure that's not a valid netmask.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
4 months ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm not sure if B) is the right answer. Maybe I should double-check the details of the LTM device and the persistence profile.
upvoted 0 times
Jess
1 months ago
User2: I'll double-check the details just to be sure
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
2 months ago
User3: I agree with User1, A) netmask 0.0.0.0 seems to be the right choice
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
2 months ago
User4: Let's double-check the information to be certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
2 months ago
User2: I'm not sure about that, maybe it's C) netmask 255.255.0.0
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
2 months ago
User3: I believe the answer is B) netmask 255.255.255.255
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
2 months ago
User1: I think the correct answer is A) netmask 0.0.0.0
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
2 months ago
User2: I'm not so sure, maybe we should review the details again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
2 months ago
User1: I think the correct answer is A) netmask 0.0.0.0
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Altha
4 months ago
I think the answer is B) netmask 255.255.255.255. This will create a unique persistence record for each unique IP address, which is what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
Nan
3 months ago
That makes sense, each unique IP address will have its own persistence record
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
3 months ago
I agree with you, the answer is B) netmask 255.255.255.255
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audry
4 months ago
But wouldn't setting the netmask to 0.0.0.0 mean that each unique IP address creates a persistence record?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) netmask 0.0.0.0
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
4 months ago
I think the answer is B) netmask 255.255.255.255
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel