Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Exin Exam PDPF Topic 7 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's PDPF exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 7
[All PDPF Questions]

A person finds that a private videotape showing her in a very intimate situation has been published on a website. She never consented to publication and demands that the video is being removed without undue delay.

According to the GDPR, what should be done next?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Controller: Correct. The controller determines the purpose and means of the processing. (Literature: A, Chapter 1; GDPR Article 4(7))

Processor: Incorrect. The controller determines the purpose of the processing, the processor works on the controller's instructions.

Supervisory authority: Incorrect. The supervisory authority monitors and enforces compliance with the GDPR requirements.

Third party: Incorrect. A third party has no role in determining the purpose of the processing. Any party that determines the purpose would become a new controller.


by Cheryl at Feb 10, 2025, 01:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PDPF Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ty
2 months ago
Option A? Are you kidding me? Letting a non-consensual intimate video stay up because it's 'news'? Someone's been watching too much 'Black Mirror'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
2 months ago
Option D? Really? Sending the person to a lawyer and waiting for a court order? Talk about bureaucracy gone wild. Just take the video down, it's the right thing to do!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
3 months ago
I'm going with option C. Why should the controller have to track down and inform every other controller? That seems like a lot of work, and they already erased the video, so that's good enough.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
1 months ago
C: Yeah, I agree. It's better to be thorough and make sure the video is completely removed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 months ago
A: I see your point. Maybe it's better to go with option B then, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
1 months ago
B: But what if someone else still has a copy of the video? Shouldn't they be told to erase it too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
1 months ago
A: I think option C is the best choice. The controller already erased the video, so they shouldn't have to inform others.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katlyn
3 months ago
I don't know, option A seems reasonable to me. The website has a right to freedom of expression, right? What do I know, I'm just a candidate.
upvoted 0 times
Octavio
2 months ago
C) The controller erases the video from the website. There is no obligation to inform others who might have copied it, that it should be erased.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
2 months ago
I think option B is more appropriate. The controller should erase the video and inform others who might process it to do the same.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
2 months ago
A) Nothing. The video may be regarded as 'news' and, therefore, the website is only exercising its right to freedom of expression and information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paul
3 months ago
Option B is clearly the correct answer. The GDPR requires the controller to erase the video and inform any other controllers who might have it. Anything less is unacceptable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
4 months ago
But what if the website argues it's 'news' and protected by freedom of expression?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
4 months ago
I agree with Allene. It's a violation of privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
4 months ago
I think the video should be removed from the website.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel