MENU
What would increase the amount of detail in the Configuration Management Database (CMDB)?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium ITSM20FB Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
LE
Leota
11 months ago
Totally agree with the idea of using the CMDB more!
KI
Kina
11 months ago
Wait, can we really just add more attributes like that?
BA
Barbra
11 months ago
More records won't necessarily mean more detail.
LA
Larae
11 months ago
I think increasing the scope is key too.
RO
Rosita
12 months ago
Definitely increasing the number of attributes for each CI!
GL
Gladys
12 months ago
I feel like increasing the use of the CMDB could lead to more detail, but I can't quite recall how that connects to the other options.
CH
Chauncey
12 months ago
Increasing the number of records sounds like it would add detail, but I wonder if it just adds volume without depth.
MI
Michell
1 year ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned increasing the scope of the CMDB, which seems relevant here too. Maybe that could help with detail as well?
BE
Beula
1 year ago
I think increasing the number of attributes for each CI could definitely add more detail, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only way.
LI
Lindsey
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully and review the Cisco UCM configuration options.
SA
Sabine
1 year ago
I think the answer is A - clone the Content Pack dashboard and then edit the clone. That way you can preserve the original dashboard while making your own customizations.
HY
Hyman
1 year ago
Okay, I think the key here is that we need a view that includes both the change request category and the status of the change. The "change_request_category_sla" view sounds like it might be the right choice, since it likely includes information on the category and the status of the closed changes.
MA
Matthew
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a good handle on this. The IlrJMXRuleAppMBean API is used to create, list, and remove RuleApps, which are the named and versioned rule applications. That matches option C, so I'm confident that's the correct answer.