New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin ITSM20F.EN Exam - Topic 4 Question 118 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ITSM20F.EN exam
Question #: 118
Topic #: 4
[All ITSM20F.EN Questions]

Availability and Service Continuity Plans need to be developed and reviewed periodically to ensure that requirements are met as agreed in all circumstances, from normal operations through to a major loss of service. What is the minimum level of frequency with which these Plans should be developed and reviewed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Stefany
3 days ago
Every change to the business environment makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
8 days ago
Surprised that some think bi-annually is enough!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
13 days ago
Option B) At least annually is the correct answer. Anything less frequent would be irresponsible, and more often is just unnecessary bureaucracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
18 days ago
C) At least bi-annually is the way to go. Reviewing the plans twice a year is a good balance between keeping them current and not being too burdensome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
24 days ago
D) In accordance with the business needs is the way to go. The frequency should be flexible to adapt to the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
29 days ago
B) At least annually seems like the most reasonable option. Reviewing the plans annually ensures they stay up-to-date with the business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
1 month ago
I recall that changes in the business environment could trigger a review, but I can't remember if that means it should be done every time or just at least once a year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 month ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I want to say it was at least annually, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
1 month ago
I remember discussing that these plans should be reviewed regularly, but I'm not sure if it should be annually or bi-annually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
2 months ago
Ugh, this is a tricky one. I'm torn between B and D. I feel like D gives the most room for the plans to adapt to the business needs, but B provides a clear, consistent timeline. Decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards C. Reviewing the plans bi-annually seems more thorough than just annually, without being excessive. But I could see the argument for B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 months ago
I'm pretty confident that B is the right answer. Reviewing the plans annually seems like a good balance between keeping them up-to-date and not being overly burdensome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
2 months ago
I think B is the safest choice. Annual reviews keep things fresh.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
2 months ago
Definitely agree with option D, it really depends on the business needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
3 months ago
I think it should be at least annually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
3 months ago
A) At every change to the business environment is overkill. The plans don't need to be updated that frequently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
3 months ago
I feel like the frequency really depends on the business needs, but I'm not confident if that's the minimum requirement they are asking for here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Do the plans need to be reviewed more often if the business environment changes a lot? D seems to give the most flexibility, but B is probably the most conservative choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
3 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the frequency of review, not the content of the plans. B seems like the safest option since it's a clear, regular interval.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel