Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin ASM Exam - Topic 5 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ASM exam

Question #: 93
Topic #: 5

[All ASM Questions]

What is the main reason to limit Scrum Teams to 9 team members?

AFeeding more than 9 team members pizza is unpractical.

BSmaller teams are generally more productive.

CThere is a maximum of 9 functions in development.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Lavonna at Nov 24, 2025, 03:28 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Tanesha

5 months ago

Exactly! B leads to higher productivity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raul

5 months ago

B is proven. More focus, less chaos.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenise

5 months ago

C sounds off. Functions can vary, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennie

6 months ago

A is funny, but not the real reason!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

6 months ago

I think B is the best choice. Smaller teams work better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefanie

6 months ago

Totally agree with B, smaller teams can communicate better!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elroy

6 months ago

Wait, is there really a limit of 9 functions? That sounds off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phyliss

7 months ago

A is hilarious, but seriously, B makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dahlia

7 months ago

I disagree, size doesn't always matter.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

7 months ago

The real reason is to keep the team small enough that they can all fit in a phone booth together. You know, for those impromptu team-building exercises.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doug

7 months ago

I'm pretty sure the 9-member limit is to ensure that the team can all hold hands in a circle during the retrospective. Anything more and it just gets awkward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

7 months ago

Duh, it's because 9 is the perfect number of people to order a large pizza for the team. Any more and you'd have to get two pizzas, which is just wasteful.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ailene

8 months ago

I thought the limit was 9 team members because that's the maximum number of people Scrum Masters can keep track of in their heads during the daily standup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

8 months ago

I believe it’s related to productivity, but I also recall something about team cohesion being better with fewer members.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margo

8 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the functions part. I thought the limit was more about team dynamics rather than a specific number of functions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronna

8 months ago

I remember reading that smaller teams can communicate better, which might be why they suggest 9 members. It feels like a common practice question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reta

8 months ago

I think the limit is about team productivity, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s specifically about being more productive with fewer members.

upvoted 0 times

...

Douglass

8 months ago

I'm not totally sure about the reasoning behind the 9-member limit, but I know smaller teams tend to be more productive, so I'll go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

9 months ago

I remember learning about this in class. I think the 9-member limit is to keep the team size small enough to be agile and collaborative. Option B sounds right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamika

9 months ago

The 9-member limit makes sense to me - it's probably to keep the team size manageable and ensure good communication. I'll go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anissa

9 months ago

B is spot on! Smaller teams really do get more done.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

9 months ago

The main reason is clearly to ensure that the team can fit around a single table for their daily scrum meetings. Anything larger and they'd have to resort to video calls.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cheryl

10 months ago

Agreed, B makes sense. Less coordination needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaitlyn

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I don't think the pizza thing is the real reason, so I'll have to think this through more carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willodean

10 months ago

I'm not sure about the specific reason for the 9-member limit, but I know smaller teams are generally more effective, so I'll go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

Jospeh

4 months ago

Definitely, keeping it small helps everyone stay focused.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeanice

5 months ago

Yeah, too many people can complicate things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

5 months ago

I wonder if it's just about communication efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colette

5 months ago

Option B makes the most sense to me too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Walton

9 months ago

I agree, smaller teams really do seem to get more done.

upvoted 0 times

...

...