New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin ASM Exam - Topic 5 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ASM exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 5
[All ASM Questions]

What is the main reason to limit Scrum Teams to 9 team members?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Phyliss
3 days ago
A is hilarious, but seriously, B makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
8 days ago
I disagree, size doesn't always matter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
13 days ago
The real reason is to keep the team small enough that they can all fit in a phone booth together. You know, for those impromptu team-building exercises.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
18 days ago
I'm pretty sure the 9-member limit is to ensure that the team can all hold hands in a circle during the retrospective. Anything more and it just gets awkward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
24 days ago
Duh, it's because 9 is the perfect number of people to order a large pizza for the team. Any more and you'd have to get two pizzas, which is just wasteful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
29 days ago
I thought the limit was 9 team members because that's the maximum number of people Scrum Masters can keep track of in their heads during the daily standup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
1 month ago
I believe it’s related to productivity, but I also recall something about team cohesion being better with fewer members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
1 month ago
I’m a bit confused about the functions part. I thought the limit was more about team dynamics rather than a specific number of functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
1 month ago
I remember reading that smaller teams can communicate better, which might be why they suggest 9 members. It feels like a common practice question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
2 months ago
I think the limit is about team productivity, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s specifically about being more productive with fewer members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
2 months ago
I'm not totally sure about the reasoning behind the 9-member limit, but I know smaller teams tend to be more productive, so I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
2 months ago
I remember learning about this in class. I think the 9-member limit is to keep the team size small enough to be agile and collaborative. Option B sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
2 months ago
The 9-member limit makes sense to me - it's probably to keep the team size manageable and ensure good communication. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
2 months ago
B is spot on! Smaller teams really do get more done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
3 months ago
The main reason is clearly to ensure that the team can fit around a single table for their daily scrum meetings. Anything larger and they'd have to resort to video calls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
3 months ago
Agreed, B makes sense. Less coordination needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I don't think the pizza thing is the real reason, so I'll have to think this through more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
3 months ago
I'm not sure about the specific reason for the 9-member limit, but I know smaller teams are generally more effective, so I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
Walton
3 months ago
I agree, smaller teams really do seem to get more done.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel