Exin ASM Exam - Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ASM exam

Question #: 60
Topic #: 1

[All ASM Questions]

A Scrum team has agreed on the following definition of potentially shippable

Potential By shippable increments must have been tested and must meet the conditions of satisfaction provided by the Product Owner Why Is it important to include 'tested' in the definition of what is potentially shippable?

ABecause each potentially shippable increment that has passed these tests will be released to users

BBecause increments are not done without testing to make sure the product will work as expected

CBecause testing shows how well the separate developed increments are integrated with each other

DBecause testing will prove that the increments are part of a cohesive whole and the sprint goal set

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Andree at May 01, 2024, 11:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Bambi

3 months ago

I think testing is overrated sometimes, but I see the point.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

3 months ago

Testing is crucial for integration, can't skip that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

3 months ago

Isn't it possible to ship without testing if it's just a minor update?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

4 months ago

Totally agree, no testing means no trust in the product!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kattie

4 months ago

Testing ensures quality before release.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zona

4 months ago

I thought A was about releasing to users, but isn't it more about ensuring the product works as expected? I guess B could fit that idea better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anthony

4 months ago

I feel like D makes a strong point about proving the increments are cohesive with the sprint goal. That’s something we practiced in our last mock exam.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

4 months ago

I’m not entirely sure, but I think testing also helps with integration issues, so maybe C could be a good answer too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassi

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how testing is crucial for ensuring that the product meets the quality standards before release. It seems like B might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wendell

5 months ago

I feel pretty good about this one. The definition states that potentially shippable increments must have been tested, so the answer has to be related to the importance of testing. I'm leaning towards D - testing will prove the increments are part of a cohesive whole and the sprint goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

5 months ago

Okay, let me break this down. The key is understanding why "tested" is included in the definition of potentially shippable. I think option C makes the most sense - testing shows how the separate increments are integrated, which is crucial for a potentially shippable product.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julieta

5 months ago

This is a pretty straightforward question. I think the answer is B - because increments are not done without testing to make sure the product will work as expected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marion

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I can see the logic behind a few of the answers, but I'm not 100% confident in my choice. I might need to re-read the question and think it through a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

5 months ago

Okay, the key information here is that the IPv4 routes are being exchanged as expected, but the IPv6 routes from R2 are not showing up on R1. I think I'll start by checking the BGP neighbor configuration on R1 to make sure the IPv6 session is set up properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alecia

5 months ago

I think the key here is to consider the different factors that contribute to the overall severity of a security incident. The impact, urgency, and priority seem like the most relevant factors to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alise

5 months ago

I think semi-finished goods would be categorized as work in process, but I'm not completely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lourdes

9 months ago

I'm with Frederica on this one. Who needs testing these days? Just slap a 'beta' label on it and let the cusFredericaers find the bugs for you. But I guess the Scrum team is a bit more old-fashioned. Option B it is.

upvoted 0 times

Marvel

8 months ago

Exactly, testing is crucial to prove that the increments are part of a cohesive whole.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brynn

8 months ago

Testing also helps to show how well the different increments are integrated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anglea

8 months ago

Yeah, without testing, how can we be sure the increments are done properly?

upvoted 0 times

...

Nadine

8 months ago

I think testing is important to make sure the product works as expected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicitas

9 months ago

Option C makes the most sense to me. Testing the integration of the increments is key to ensuring they work together as a cohesive whole. That's what 'potentially shippable' is all about, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Frederica

10 months ago

Haha, testing? What is this, amateur hour? Real pros just ship it and let the users figure it out! But I guess the Scrum team likes to play it safe. Option B it is.

upvoted 0 times

Jean

8 months ago

C: Because testing will prove that the increments are part of a cohesive whole and the sprint goal set

upvoted 0 times

...

Fletcher

8 months ago

B: Haha, testing? What is this, amateur hour? Real pros just ship it and let the users figure it out! But I guess the Scrum team likes to play it safe. Option B it is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

9 months ago

A: Because increments are not done without testing to make sure the product will work as expected

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

10 months ago

I agree with Jeffrey. Testing is a vital step to validate the quality and integration of the increments. It's not enough to just develop the features - they need to be thoroughly tested first.

upvoted 0 times

Nguyet

8 months ago

D: Because testing will prove that the increments are part of a cohesive whole and the sprint goal set

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

9 months ago

C: Because testing shows how well the separate developed increments are integrated with each other

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

9 months ago

B: Because increments are not done without testing to make sure the product will work as expected

upvoted 0 times

...

Dawne

9 months ago

A: Because each potentially shippable increment that has passed these tests will be released to users

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeffrey

10 months ago

Option B is the correct answer. Testing is crucial to ensure that the increment works as expected before it can be considered potentially shippable. Without testing, we can't be sure the product will function properly.

upvoted 0 times

Jerlene

9 months ago

User 2: Testing is crucial to ensure that the increment works as expected before it can be considered potentially shippable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Niesha

10 months ago

User 1: Option B is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charisse

11 months ago

I believe that testing also helps in identifying any integration issues between the separate developed increments, making sure they work well together.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janae

11 months ago

I agree with Annamae. Testing ensures that the product works as expected and meets the conditions of satisfaction provided by the Product Owner.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annamae

11 months ago

I think it's important to include 'tested' in the definition of potentially shippable because increments need to be reliable before releasing them to users.

upvoted 0 times

...