MENU
A Scrum team has agreed on the following definition of potentially shippable
Potential By shippable increments must have been tested and must meet the conditions of satisfaction provided by the Product Owner Why Is it important to include 'tested' in the definition of what is potentially shippable?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium ASM Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
BA
Bambi
11 months ago
I think testing is overrated sometimes, but I see the point.
ST
Stevie
11 months ago
Testing is crucial for integration, can't skip that!
AN
Annice
11 months ago
Isn't it possible to ship without testing if it's just a minor update?
GE
Gerald
11 months ago
Totally agree, no testing means no trust in the product!
KA
Kattie
12 months ago
Testing ensures quality before release.
ZO
Zona
12 months ago
I thought A was about releasing to users, but isn't it more about ensuring the product works as expected? I guess B could fit that idea better.
AN
Anthony
12 months ago
I feel like D makes a strong point about proving the increments are cohesive with the sprint goal. That’s something we practiced in our last mock exam.
QU
Quentin
1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think testing also helps with integration issues, so maybe C could be a good answer too.
CA
Cassi
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how testing is crucial for ensuring that the product meets the quality standards before release. It seems like B might be the right choice.
WE
Wendell
1 year ago
I feel pretty good about this one. The definition states that potentially shippable increments must have been tested, so the answer has to be related to the importance of testing. I'm leaning towards D - testing will prove the increments are part of a cohesive whole and the sprint goal.
AL
Alyce
1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down. The key is understanding why "tested" is included in the definition of potentially shippable. I think option C makes the most sense - testing shows how the separate increments are integrated, which is crucial for a potentially shippable product.
JU
Julieta
1 year ago
This is a pretty straightforward question. I think the answer is B - because increments are not done without testing to make sure the product will work as expected.
MA
Marion
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I can see the logic behind a few of the answers, but I'm not 100% confident in my choice. I might need to re-read the question and think it through a bit more.
WI
Willard
1 year ago
Okay, the key information here is that the IPv4 routes are being exchanged as expected, but the IPv6 routes from R2 are not showing up on R1. I think I'll start by checking the BGP neighbor configuration on R1 to make sure the IPv6 session is set up properly.
AL
Alecia
1 year ago
I think the key here is to consider the different factors that contribute to the overall severity of a security incident. The impact, urgency, and priority seem like the most relevant factors to me.
AL
Alise
1 year ago
I think semi-finished goods would be categorized as work in process, but I'm not completely sure.
LO
Lourdes
1 year ago
I'm with Frederica on this one. Who needs testing these days? Just slap a 'beta' label on it and let the cusFredericaers find the bugs for you. But I guess the Scrum team is a bit more old-fashioned. Option B it is.
MA
Marvel
1 year ago
Exactly, testing is crucial to prove that the increments are part of a cohesive whole.
BR
Brynn
1 year ago
Testing also helps to show how well the different increments are integrated.
AN
Anglea
1 year ago
Yeah, without testing, how can we be sure the increments are done properly?
NA
Nadine
1 year ago
I think testing is important to make sure the product works as expected.
FE
Felicitas
1 year ago
Option C makes the most sense to me. Testing the integration of the increments is key to ensuring they work together as a cohesive whole. That's what 'potentially shippable' is all about, right?
FR
Frederica
1 year ago
Haha, testing? What is this, amateur hour? Real pros just ship it and let the users figure it out! But I guess the Scrum team likes to play it safe. Option B it is.
JE
Jean
1 year ago
C: Because testing will prove that the increments are part of a cohesive whole and the sprint goal set
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
B: Haha, testing? What is this, amateur hour? Real pros just ship it and let the users figure it out! But I guess the Scrum team likes to play it safe. Option B it is.
WI
Willard
1 year ago
A: Because increments are not done without testing to make sure the product will work as expected
GA
Gary
2 years ago
I agree with Jeffrey. Testing is a vital step to validate the quality and integration of the increments. It's not enough to just develop the features - they need to be thoroughly tested first.
NG
Nguyet
1 year ago
D: Because testing will prove that the increments are part of a cohesive whole and the sprint goal set
BO
Boris
1 year ago
C: Because testing shows how well the separate developed increments are integrated with each other
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
B: Because increments are not done without testing to make sure the product will work as expected
DA
Dawne
1 year ago
A: Because each potentially shippable increment that has passed these tests will be released to users
JE
Jeffrey
2 years ago
Option B is the correct answer. Testing is crucial to ensure that the increment works as expected before it can be considered potentially shippable. Without testing, we can't be sure the product will function properly.
JE
Jerlene
1 year ago
User 2: Testing is crucial to ensure that the increment works as expected before it can be considered potentially shippable.
NI
Niesha
1 year ago
User 1: Option B is the correct answer.
CH
Charisse
2 years ago
I believe that testing also helps in identifying any integration issues between the separate developed increments, making sure they work well together.
JA
Janae
2 years ago
I agree with Annamae. Testing ensures that the product works as expected and meets the conditions of satisfaction provided by the Product Owner.
AN
Annamae
2 years ago
I think it's important to include 'tested' in the definition of potentially shippable because increments need to be reliable before releasing them to users.