Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri EGMP2201 Exam - Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EGMP2201 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 1
[All EGMP2201 Questions]

A GIS administrator receives reports of slowing performance across the entire geodatabase. Users report that the time for edits to be made and drawing are affected when adding 10.000 records. Traditional versioning is being used.

The following processes are completed weekly:

* Rebuilding of indexes and statistics

* Geodatabase compress

* Remove orphaned connections

Which action should be taken?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To track feature class changes while keeping the reconcile, post, and compress processes separate from the replica synchronization process, the best approach is to create a one-way replica using the archive option on Default.

1. Why Use a One-Way Replica on Default?

One-Way Replication:

Sends data changes from the parent (Default version) to the child geodatabase, ensuring that synchronization does not interfere with the parent geodatabase's versioning operations.

Archive Option:

Archiving captures all changes to the feature class, providing a history of edits without requiring versioning in the replica.

2. Why Choose the Default Version?

Using the Default version as the parent ensures that all reconciled and posted changes are synchronized to the replica, making the synchronization independent of ongoing versioning workflows in the geodatabase.

3. Why Not Other Options?

Create a One-Way Replica Using the Archive Option on a Child Version of Default:

Replicating from a child version complicates workflows because the child version must be reconciled and posted to Default before updates are reflected in the replica.

Create a Two-Way Replica Using the Archive Option on Default:

Two-way replication synchronizes changes in both directions. This would integrate changes from the child geodatabase into Default, interfering with the reconciliation and posting processes.

Steps to Create the Replica:

Ensure archiving is enabled for the feature classes in the Default version.

Use the Create Replica tool in ArcGIS Pro and select One-Way Replication.

Configure the replica to include the archive option.

Synchronize the replica as needed without affecting versioning processes in the parent geodatabase.

Reference from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

One-Way Replication Overview

Geodatabase Archiving

Conclusion:

To track changes while separating reconcile, post, and compress processes from synchronization, the GIS analyst should create a one-way replica using the archive option on Default.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Wade
4 months ago
I'm surprised they haven't tried optimizing the database structure yet!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
4 months ago
Wait, are we really still using traditional versioning?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
4 months ago
Reconcile and post versions might be the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
5 months ago
I disagree, I think updating via Python is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
5 months ago
Changing to Default version could help speed things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
5 months ago
I feel like the weekly maintenance tasks should help, but if users are still experiencing slowdowns, maybe we really need to look at reconciling and posting versions more frequently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether updating records via Python would actually improve performance. It seems like a different approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
5 months ago
I think I saw a similar question where reconciling and posting versions helped with performance issues. That might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
6 months ago
I remember something about versioning affecting performance, but I'm not sure if switching to Default version is the best move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'll need to review the information more closely to determine the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
6 months ago
Reconciling and posting versions seems like the most logical step, but I want to make sure I understand the implications before selecting that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
6 months ago
Updating records via Python might work, but I'm not sure if that's the right solution for this specific problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. Changing to the Default version could help, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
6 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
10 months ago
Wait, they want me to do work? I thought this was an exam, not a call for manual labor. Forget the options, I'm just going to sit back and watch the geodatabase implode. That'll show 'em!
upvoted 0 times
Kanisha
9 months ago
User3: I'm not doing anything, I'll just watch it all fall apart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
9 months ago
User2: Let's try reconciling and posting versions, that might help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
10 months ago
User1: Come on, we need to take action to fix the slowing performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ty
10 months ago
I'm going with C. Reconcile and post versions. It's the only option that doesn't involve some kind of sorcery or black magic. Although, a little Python voodoo could be fun...
upvoted 0 times
Galen
8 months ago
I agree, let's go with C and avoid any potential Python voodoo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
8 months ago
C sounds like the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
8 months ago
C) Reconcile and post versions
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
9 months ago
B) Update records via Python
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
9 months ago
A) Change to use Default version
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shalon
10 months ago
A) Change to use Default version? What is this, amateur hour? You can't just switch versioning methods on a whim. C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
10 months ago
B) Update records via Python? Really? That's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline. This question is a no-brainer, C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Slyvia
10 months ago
C) Reconcile and post versions
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
10 months ago
B) Update records via Python
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudia
10 months ago
A) Change to use Default version
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jarvis
11 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. Reconcile and post versions. That's the only option that directly addresses the issue of slow performance due to traditional versioning.
upvoted 0 times
Ryann
9 months ago
User1: I see your point, but reconciling and posting versions directly tackles the problem we're facing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
9 months ago
User3: I'm not sure, maybe we should also consider option A, changing to use Default version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
10 months ago
User2: Agreed, that seems like the best solution to address the slow performance issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
11 months ago
User1: I think we should go with option C, reconcile and post versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryll
12 months ago
I'm not sure about option C. Maybe we should also consider option A, changing to use Default version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
12 months ago
I agree with Remedios. Reconciling and posting versions could help resolve the performance problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
12 months ago
I think we should try option C, reconcile and post versions. It might help with the slowing performance issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel