Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri EGMP2201 Exam - Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Posted by Jesusita on Mar 04, 2025 at 04:28 AM

A GIS administrator receives reports of slowing performance across the entire geodatabase. Users report that the time for edits to be made and drawing are affected when adding 10.000 records. Traditional versioning is being used.

The following processes are completed weekly:

* Rebuilding of indexes and statistics

* Geodatabase compress

* Remove orphaned connections

Which action should be taken?

Suggested Answer: B

To track feature class changes while keeping the reconcile, post, and compress processes separate from the replica synchronization process, the best approach is to create a one-way replica using the archive option on Default.

1. Why Use a One-Way Replica on Default?

One-Way Replication:

Sends data changes from the parent (Default version) to the child geodatabase, ensuring that synchronization does not interfere with the parent geodatabase's versioning operations.

Archive Option:

Archiving captures all changes to the feature class, providing a history of edits without requiring versioning in the replica.

2. Why Choose the Default Version?

Using the Default version as the parent ensures that all reconciled and posted changes are synchronized to the replica, making the synchronization independent of ongoing versioning workflows in the geodatabase.

3. Why Not Other Options?

Create a One-Way Replica Using the Archive Option on a Child Version of Default:

Replicating from a child version complicates workflows because the child version must be reconciled and posted to Default before updates are reflected in the replica.

Create a Two-Way Replica Using the Archive Option on Default:

Two-way replication synchronizes changes in both directions. This would integrate changes from the child geodatabase into Default, interfering with the reconciliation and posting processes.

Steps to Create the Replica:

Ensure archiving is enabled for the feature classes in the Default version.

Use the Create Replica tool in ArcGIS Pro and select One-Way Replication.

Configure the replica to include the archive option.

Synchronize the replica as needed without affecting versioning processes in the parent geodatabase.

Reference from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

One-Way Replication Overview

Geodatabase Archiving

Conclusion:

To track changes while separating reconcile, post, and compress processes from synchronization, the GIS analyst should create a one-way replica using the archive option on Default.


Get Premium EGMP2201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
WA
Wade 11 months ago
I'm surprised they haven't tried optimizing the database structure yet!
VI
Vi 11 months ago
Wait, are we really still using traditional versioning?
FR
Frederica 11 months ago
Reconcile and post versions might be the best option here.
WA
Walton 12 months ago
I disagree, I think updating via Python is the way to go.
LE
Lemuel 12 months ago
Changing to Default version could help speed things up.
KR
Kris 12 months ago
I feel like the weekly maintenance tasks should help, but if users are still experiencing slowdowns, maybe we really need to look at reconciling and posting versions more frequently.
TE
Tesha 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about whether updating records via Python would actually improve performance. It seems like a different approach.
DE
Deeanna 1 year ago
I think I saw a similar question where reconciling and posting versions helped with performance issues. That might be the right choice here.
TE
Teri 1 year ago
I remember something about versioning affecting performance, but I'm not sure if switching to Default version is the best move.
DY
Dylan 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'll need to review the information more closely to determine the best course of action.
TA
Tayna 1 year ago
Reconciling and posting versions seems like the most logical step, but I want to make sure I understand the implications before selecting that option.
BE
Belen 1 year ago
Updating records via Python might work, but I'm not sure if that's the right solution for this specific problem.
CA
Carman 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Changing to the Default version could help, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here.
LO
Loren 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
KI
Kirby 1 year ago
Wait, they want me to do work? I thought this was an exam, not a call for manual labor. Forget the options, I'm just going to sit back and watch the geodatabase implode. That'll show 'em!
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kirby
User3: I'm not doing anything, I'll just watch it all fall apart.
FA
Fatima 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kirby
User2: Let's try reconciling and posting versions, that might help.
BR
Brittney 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kirby
User1: Come on, we need to take action to fix the slowing performance.
TY
Ty 1 year ago
I'm going with C. Reconcile and post versions. It's the only option that doesn't involve some kind of sorcery or black magic. Although, a little Python voodoo could be fun...
GA
Galen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ty
I agree, let's go with C and avoid any potential Python voodoo.
LO
Lorenza 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ty
C sounds like the most straightforward option.
CE
Celia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ty
C) Reconcile and post versions
YO
Yolando 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ty
B) Update records via Python
CH
Chau 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ty
A) Change to use Default version
SH
Shalon 1 year ago
A) Change to use Default version? What is this, amateur hour? You can't just switch versioning methods on a whim. C is the clear winner here.
AL
Alex 1 year ago
B) Update records via Python? Really? That's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline. This question is a no-brainer, C is the way to go.
SL
Slyvia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alex
C) Reconcile and post versions
PE
Penney 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alex
B) Update records via Python
CL
Claudia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alex
A) Change to use Default version
JA
Jarvis 2 years ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. Reconcile and post versions. That's the only option that directly addresses the issue of slow performance due to traditional versioning.
RY
Ryann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
User1: I see your point, but reconciling and posting versions directly tackles the problem we're facing.
KA
Kate 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
User3: I'm not sure, maybe we should also consider option A, changing to use Default version.
AD
Adelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
User2: Agreed, that seems like the best solution to address the slow performance issue.
LA
Lashaun 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
User1: I think we should go with option C, reconcile and post versions.
CH
Cheryll 2 years ago
I'm not sure about option C. Maybe we should also consider option A, changing to use Default version.
BE
Bev 2 years ago
I agree with Remedios. Reconciling and posting versions could help resolve the performance problem.
RE
Remedios 2 years ago
I think we should try option C, reconcile and post versions. It might help with the slowing performance issue.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel