Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 8 Question 35 Discussion

An ArcGIS user wants to symbolize the intersections of highways and streets so that the road casing symbols can be blended together to represent connectivity, but not blended in other situations to represent disconnectivity (e.g. where a highway passes under a surface street)What should be used to ensure that the road casings connect correctly?
C) multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other
A) symbol-level drawing with the join option
B) symbol-level drawing with the merge option
D) single layered symbol with two offset lines

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 8 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 8
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGIS user wants to symbolize the intersections of highways and streets so that the road casing symbols can be blended together to represent connectivity, but not blended in other situations to represent disconnectivity (e.g. where a highway passes under a surface street)

What should be used to ensure that the road casings connect correctly?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Barrett at Dec 08, 2023, 12:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ressie
10 months ago
Surprised this is even a question, A is clearly the best option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
10 months ago
C could also be a good choice, but I'm leaning towards A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure A is right? I thought merging might work better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
10 months ago
Definitely agree with A! It makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
10 months ago
I think option A is the way to go for blending.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards the single layered symbol with offset lines, but I’m not confident that it would achieve the desired effect at intersections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
11 months ago
I feel like using a multi-layered symbol could work, especially if one layer is wider, but I can't recall the specifics on how that affects connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
11 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think the merge option was highlighted as a way to blend symbols effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
11 months ago
I think the join option might be the right choice since it allows for better connectivity at intersections, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure which of these options would give me the blending and non-blending effects I need. I think I'll need to do some research on symbol-level drawing and multi-layered symbols to figure out which one is the best fit. I don't want to just guess, so I'll take the time to really understand the question before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I want the road casings to connect at intersections but not blend where the highway passes under the surface street. The multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other seems like the most promising option to achieve that. I'll make sure to test it out thoroughly before submitting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if the symbol-level drawing options would give me the level of control I need to get the connectivity and disconnectivity effects I'm looking for. The multi-layered symbol with offset lines might be the way to go, but I'll need to experiment with it to see if it gives the right result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
11 months ago
I think the key here is to find a way to symbolize the roads so that the casings connect at intersections but don't blend where the highway passes under the surface street. The multi-layered symbol option with one layer wider than the other sounds like it could work for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward - we need to identify the root cause of the microservice failures, and the options provided give us some good places to start looking. I think I'll focus on the instrumentation that's already in place, like Sqlcommenter and Cloud Trace, to see if I can get more visibility into what's going on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
11 months ago
I remember something about guestshell being stuck in a high CPU state. I think resyncing the database could help, but I'm not sure if it applies to this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
1 year ago
Wait, are we supposed to be symbolizing the intersections or the roads themselves? I feel like I'm missing a key detail here. Ah, well, C it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
1 year ago
I'm just hoping the exam doesn't include any questions about navigating roundabouts. That's a whole other can of worms. Anyway, I'm going with C on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Kris
1 year ago
Yeah, I'm going with C too. It should help represent connectivity without blending in disconnectivity situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
1 year ago
I agree, using a multi-layered symbol seems like the best option for connecting road casings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
1 year ago
I think C is the way to go, with one layer wider than the other.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kaycee
1 year ago
You know, I was studying for this exam while driving and almost crashed into a highway underpass. Probably should have been paying more attention to the road than the study materials. C is the answer, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about the merge option in B. Wouldn't that just make the whole thing one big blob? I think C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Celestina
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think C is the best choice for ensuring the road casings connect correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
1 year ago
I'm not convinced about C. I think using symbol-level drawing with the join option might be more precise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 year ago
I think C is the way to go as well. It will help differentiate between connectivity and disconnectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
1 year ago
I agree, using a multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Danica
1 year ago
Option C looks like the way to go. Having a multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other should do the trick to get those road casings to blend seamlessly.
upvoted 0 times
Darrel
1 year ago
Yes, using a multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other should help achieve the desired blending effect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice to ensure the road casings connect correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
1 year ago
Yes, using a multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other should help with blending the road casings together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for ensuring the road casings connect correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marsha
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D) single layered symbol with two offset lines could also work if done correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
1 year ago
I agree with Katlyn, using different layers for the road casings would help show connectivity without blending in the wrong places.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
1 year ago
I think option C) multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other would work best.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel