Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 69 Discussion

An ArcGIS user is tasked with publishing an image service out of a collection of rectified satellite imagery. Building the Image service definition results In a rotated dataset with large areas of NoData on the comers. The ArcGIS user needs to recompute the footprints to remove the large areas of NoData on the edges. Which method of recomputing footprints accomplishes this?
B) by radiometry
A) by geometry
C) by clipping
D) by related geometry

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 4
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGIS user is tasked with publishing an image service out of a collection of rectified satellite imagery. Building the Image service definition results In a rotated dataset with large areas of NoData on the comers. The ArcGIS user needs to recompute the footprints to remove the large areas of NoData on the edges. Which method of recomputing footprints accomplishes this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Corazon at Jun 15, 2025, 01:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Coral
5 months ago
Surprised it's not related geometry!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
6 months ago
I thought radiometry might be the answer...
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not by clipping?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
6 months ago
I think it's definitely by geometry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
6 months ago
Agreed, geometry is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
7 months ago
I definitely remember that radiometry is more about the pixel values, so I don't think that's the right choice for fixing the NoData issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the options. I feel like related geometry could be relevant, but I can't recall how it specifically applies to recomputing footprints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
7 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question in class, and I want to say that clipping might be the method to use here to handle those NoData edges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
7 months ago
I remember something about using geometry to recompute footprints, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right approach for NoData areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
7 months ago
This is a good one. I'm feeling pretty confident that the geometry option is the right approach. Gotta love those little tricks to clean up those pesky image service issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
8 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it. Recomputing the footprints by geometry is the way to go here. That should help me trim off those unwanted edges and get a nice, clean image service. Time to mark that one down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between the methods here. Geometry, radiometry, clipping - which one is going to give me the best result for removing those NoData corners? I'll have to review the concepts again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. Recomputing the footprints to remove the NoData areas - that sounds like it could be the key here. I'm leaning towards option A, but I'll double-check the others just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between A and C. Geometry or clipping? Decisions, decisions. Maybe I'll just flip a coin and hope for the best. ArcGIS, the gift that keeps on giving!
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
11 months ago
B. Radiometry? Really? What is this, a physics exam? I'll stick with the good old reliable C. Clipping, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
11 months ago
I'd go with D. Related geometry sounds like the perfect way to recompute those footprints and get rid of the NoData. Gotta love that ArcGIS magic!
upvoted 0 times
Willow
9 months ago
I agree, D) by related geometry seems like the best option to fix the NoData issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
9 months ago
I think A) by geometry would work better in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
9 months ago
I agree, D) by related geometry seems like the best option to fix the NoData issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
10 months ago
I agree, D) by related geometry seems like the best option to fix the NoData issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
10 months ago
I think A) by geometry would work better in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
10 months ago
I think A) by geometry would work better in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozell
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) by clipping could also potentially remove the NoData areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
12 months ago
Definitely C. Clipping is the way to go to remove those pesky NoData areas on the edges. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
11 months ago
C) by clipping
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
11 months ago
B) by radiometry
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
11 months ago
A) by geometry
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sean
12 months ago
I agree with Glendora, recomputing footprints by geometry should remove the NoData areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) by geometry.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel