Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 50 Discussion

The ArcGlS user is given data for the Arctic and is asked to perform various types of analysis using the data. The data extend from the North pole south to 70 degrees North Latitude Data layers may contain points, lines, or polygons, and Include ice surveys from NOAA depth contours continental margins, locations of Known and suspected oil reserves, endangered species habitat and territorial boundaries for nations having Arctic coastline.Given known petroleum reserves in the Arctic, plus areas reserved for endangered species habitat the user must determine the area In square miles that is available for oil extraction development for the United States.Which protection is best suited for this analysis?
A) Lambert azimuthal equal area
B) double stereographic
C) Albers equal area conic
D) Lambert conformal conic

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 2
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

The ArcGlS user is given data for the Arctic and is asked to perform various types of analysis using the dat

a. The data extend from the North pole south to 70 degrees North Latitude Data layers may contain points, lines, or polygons, and Include ice surveys from NOAA depth contours continental margins, locations of Known and suspected oil reserves, endangered species habitat and territorial boundaries for nations having Arctic coastline.

Given known petroleum reserves in the Arctic, plus areas reserved for endangered species habitat the user must determine the area In square miles that is available for oil extraction development for the United States.

Which protection is best suited for this analysis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Melvin at Jul 17, 2024, 12:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Janine
9 months ago
Double stereographic is not suited for area calculations, just saying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
10 months ago
Surprised they even consider oil extraction in endangered species habitats!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
10 months ago
Really? I thought Lambert conformal conic would be better for this kind of data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
10 months ago
I think Albers equal area conic is the best choice for this analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
10 months ago
The data covers from the North Pole to 70°N, pretty extensive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
10 months ago
I recall a similar practice question where we had to consider area preservation, so I lean towards the Lambert azimuthal equal area for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
11 months ago
I feel a bit confused about the differences between the projections. I know we practiced with the Lambert conformal conic, but I'm not sure if it's suitable here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
11 months ago
I think the Albers equal area conic might be a good choice since it preserves area, which is crucial for determining available land for oil extraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of area calculations in our last class, but I'm not sure which projection would be best for this Arctic analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
11 months ago
This seems straightforward. The key is to use a projection that preserves area, so I'd go with the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the question. Can the data layers be overlaid accurately using different projections? I'll need to do some research to make sure I choose the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since the analysis requires measuring area, I'll want to use an equal-area projection like Lambert azimuthal or Albers equal-area conic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to review the properties of the different map projections to figure out which one is most suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the data layers and the analysis requirements to determine the best projection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
11 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about Lean Six Sigma. I'm pretty confident the answer is B - Shewhart Chart, as that's a key tool for monitoring and controlling processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
2 years ago
Hmm, let me think... Albers equal area conic sounds like the way to go here. Gotta keep those oil rigs and endangered critters from colliding, you know? Though I'm pretty sure the oil companies would try to drill through a polar bear's den if they thought they could get away with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
2 years ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I was gonna go with the double stereographic, but now I'm second-guessing myself. Decisions, decisions... At least I know the Arctic is a pretty cool place, even if the politics around it are a bit icy.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
2 years ago
I agree, Albers equal area conic seems like the most suitable choice for this analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
2 years ago
I was leaning towards Lambert conformal conic, but Albers equal area conic makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
2 years ago
I think the best protection for this analysis is Albers equal area conic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracia
2 years ago
I see your point, Yolande. Albers equal area conic does seem like a good choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe Albers equal area conic would be more suitable for this type of analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
2 years ago
I think the best protection for this analysis is Lambert azimuthal equal area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
2 years ago
C'mon, this is easy. Albers equal area conic all the way. Gotta love that area preservation for this kind of regional analysis. Though I bet the oil companies are gonna try to squeeze every last drop out of those reserves, endangered species be darned.
upvoted 0 times
Berry
2 years ago
Oil companies will always try to maximize their extraction, regardless of the consequences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 years ago
Yeah, it's important to prioritize area preservation, especially for endangered species habitat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
2 years ago
I agree, Albers equal area conic is definitely the best choice for this analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
2 years ago
Oil companies will definitely try to maximize extraction, but we need to consider the long-term impact on the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
2 years ago
Yeah, it's important to prioritize area preservation, especially for endangered species habitat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
2 years ago
I agree, Albers equal area conic is the best choice for this analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
2 years ago
Hmm, the Arctic data seems pretty complex. I think the Albers equal area conic projection would be best for this analysis, since it preserves area and is well-suited for large regions like the Arctic. Though I'm curious if the oil reserves and endangered species habitats are going to overlap - that could get tricky.
upvoted 0 times
Emmett
2 years ago
Yes, it's important to preserve area when dealing with such complex data sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
2 years ago
I agree, the Albers equal area conic projection would be the best choice for this analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel