Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

An ArcGlS user receives parcel data from the regional government, which is supposed to line up with parcels in the data maintained by the local government. The user is tasked with reconciling the discrepancies between the local and regional data.In which situation are the parcel boundaries within the local data more likely to be accurate than the regional data?
B) when regional records show a new survey of a parcel in 1996. but local records do not include the survey information
A) when local records show a parcel subdivided in 2007 but regional records do not include the update
C) when a privately owned parcel is donated to the local government in 2002 for a park but the regional government does not have a record of the new owner
D) when a new subdivision surveyed in 2004 within the regional area is incorporated into the local area limits in 2007

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGlS user receives parcel data from the regional government, which is supposed to line up with parcels in the data maintained by the local government. The user is tasked with reconciling the discrepancies between the local and regional data.

In which situation are the parcel boundaries within the local data more likely to be accurate than the regional data?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Bernardo at Sep 03, 2023, 03:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Elena
7 months ago
I disagree with C, regional should have that info if it was donated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
7 months ago
Surprised that D isn't the best choice, seems like a clear update!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
7 months ago
C makes sense, local records would have the latest info.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
7 months ago
I think B could be accurate too, but not as likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
7 months ago
Definitely A! Local updates are usually more current.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the timing in option D. If the local area incorporated the subdivision later, wouldn’t the regional data still be valid until then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
8 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think it was about how local updates can sometimes be missed by regional data. So, I’m leaning towards option A again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about local records being more reliable when they reflect recent changes. Maybe that's why option C could be correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
8 months ago
I think the local data might be more accurate when they show updates like subdivisions that the regional data doesn't have. That sounds like option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
8 months ago
This seems like a tricky question, but I think I have a strategy. I'll need to carefully compare the local and regional data to identify any discrepancies, and then consider the likely reasons for those discrepancies based on the information provided in the answer choices.BobSmith: Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. I'll need to really think through the different scenarios and how they might impact the accuracy of the parcel data. I'm not totally sure which situation would make the local data more accurate, but I'll give it my best shot.SarahLee: Okay, I've got this! The key is to focus on situations where the local data would be more up-to-date than the regional data. Things like local subdivisions or ownership changes that the regional data hasn't captured yet. I'm feeling confident I can nail this one.MikeJohnson: This is a tricky one, but I think I can figure it out. I'll need to carefully consider the differences between the local and regional data and how that might impact the accuracy. I'm not 100% sure, but I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this! The key is to focus on situations where the local data would be more up-to-date than the regional data. Things like local subdivisions or ownership changes that the regional data hasn't captured yet. I'm feeling confident I can nail this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. I'll need to really think through the different scenarios and how they might impact the accuracy of the parcel data. I'm not totally sure which situation would make the local data more accurate, but I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
8 months ago
This seems like a tricky question, but I think I have a strategy. I'll need to carefully compare the local and regional data to identify any discrepancies, and then consider the likely reasons for those discrepancies based on the information provided in the answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
8 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think I can figure it out. I'll need to carefully consider the differences between the local and regional data and how that might impact the accuracy. I'm not 100% sure, but I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
8 months ago
Stopping the application services with a kill command seems risky. That could cause data loss or other issues. I'll focus on the options that allow for a more graceful shutdown.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
8 months ago
I'm pretty sure the knowledge object bundles are replicated to SPLUNK_HOME/var/lib/searchpeers, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about best practices for managing records with a third-party vendor. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the key considerations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
1 year ago
Option C is interesting, but I think A is the best answer. If the local government actually owns the parcel, they're going to have the most up-to-date and reliable information about it.
upvoted 0 times
Teri
12 months ago
Definitely, it's important to consider ownership when determining the accuracy of parcel data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
12 months ago
That makes sense, they would be more likely to have updated records compared to the regional government.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 year ago
I agree, the local government would have the most accurate information about parcels they own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
1 year ago
Definitely, it's important to consider ownership when determining the accuracy of parcel data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
1 year ago
That makes sense, they would be more likely to have updated records compared to the regional government.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
1 year ago
I agree, the local government would have the most accurate information about parcels they own.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nathalie
1 year ago
Haha, these GIS questions can be tricky, but this one's a no-brainer. Of course the local data is more accurate when it shows a more recent parcel change. The regional folks are probably still using a fax machine or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
1 year ago
I agree, A is the way to go. The local government is more likely to have the most accurate and current parcel data, especially for a recent change like a subdivision.
upvoted 0 times
Cary
1 year ago
Annmarie: Definitely, it makes sense to trust the local records in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, they are more likely to have updated information on recent changes like subdivisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, the local government usually has more accurate parcel data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
1 year ago
User 1: I think A is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamey
1 year ago
Option A seems like the clear choice here. If the local records show a parcel subdivision, that's more up-to-date and reliable than the regional data not having that information.
upvoted 0 times
Minna
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, if the local records have the subdivision update, it's probably more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, option A seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amira
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D could also be a possibility. The new subdivision surveyed in 2004 being incorporated into the local area limits in 2007 could lead to more accurate boundaries in the local data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
1 year ago
I agree with Reyes. The local records showing a subdivision update in 2007 but not included in the regional data seems like a common discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
1 year ago
I think option A is more likely to have accurate parcel boundaries in the local data.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel