Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil Exam ECSS Topic 6 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's ECSS exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 6
[All ECSS Questions]

Jacob, an attacker, targeted container technology to destroy the reputation of an organization. To achieve this, he initially compromised a single container exploiting weak network defaults, overloaded the rest of the containers in the local domain, and restricted them from providing services to legitimate users.

Identify the type of attack initiated by Jacob in the above scenario.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Francine at Aug 31, 2023, 10:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ECSS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Terry
16 days ago
Wow, Jacob really got creative with this one! I bet he's the kind of hacker who has a secret collection of cat videos on his laptop. Anyways, I reckon the correct answer is B, a cross-container attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
19 days ago
I don't know, guys. This seems more like a replay attack to me. Jacob compromised the network defaults and then replayed that attack to take down the rest of the containers. Option D is the way to go, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
20 days ago
Haha, Jacob really went all out, didn't he? Targeting the whole container infrastructure, what a bold move! I'd say this is a clear case of option B, a cross-container attack. The guy's got some skills, I'll give him that.
upvoted 0 times
Shelton
2 days ago
I agree, he really went all in with that strategy. It's a dangerous game he's playing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
4 days ago
Yeah, Jacob definitely knew what he was doing. Cross-container attack is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ahmad
28 days ago
I'm not so sure about that. The question mentions that Jacob overloaded the containers and restricted them from providing services, which sounds more like a container escaping attack to me. I think C is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
1 months ago
Hmm, this sounds like a classic case of a cross-container attack. Jacob exploited the weak network defaults to compromise a single container and then used that foothold to target the rest of the containers in the domain. That's definitely option B.
upvoted 0 times
Brande
1 days ago
Absolutely, a cross-container attack fits the description perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
1 days ago
Yes, you're right. Jacob's attack on the containers by compromising one and then targeting the others definitely fits the description of a cross-container attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
21 days ago
Yes, I agree. Jacob's actions align with a cross-container attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loreta
2 months ago
I believe it could also be a Container escaping attack, as Jacob compromised a single container and then restricted the others from providing services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
2 months ago
I agree with Salena. Jacob targeted multiple containers in the local domain, so it seems like a Cross container attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
2 months ago
I think the attack initiated by Jacob is a Cross container attack.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel