Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil ECSS Exam - Topic 3 Question 121 Discussion

James is a professional hacker attempting to gain access to an industrial system through a remote control device. In this process, he used a specially designed radio transceiver device to sniff radio commands and inject arbitrary code into the firmware of the remote controllers to maintain persistence.Which of the following attacks is performed by James in the above scenario?
A) Malicious reprogramming attack
B) Re pairing with a malicious RF controller
C) Command injection
D) Abusing reprogramming attack

Eccouncil ECSS Exam - Topic 3 Question 121 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's ECSS exam
Question #: 121
Topic #: 3
[All ECSS Questions]

James is a professional hacker attempting to gain access to an industrial system through a remote control device. In this process, he used a specially designed radio transceiver device to sniff radio commands and inject arbitrary code into the firmware of the remote controllers to maintain persistence.

Which of the following attacks is performed by James in the above scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

James is performing amalicious reprogramming attackin the given scenario. He uses a specially designed radio transceiver device to sniff radio commands and inject arbitrary code into the firmware of the remote controllers. This allows him to maintain persistence and potentially gain unauthorized access to the industrial system.


EC-Council Certified Security Specialist (E|CSS) documents and study guide12.

by Ivette at May 29, 2026, 07:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ECSS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Julianna
2 days ago
But what about B) Re pairing with a malicious RF controller? Sounds plausible too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
7 days ago
I agree with Bok. Command injection fits best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
12 days ago
I feel like it's C) Command injection. He’s injecting code, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
18 days ago
This is tricky! I think it's A) Malicious reprogramming attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
23 days ago
Nah, it’s definitely abusing reprogramming attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
28 days ago
I think it's more about re-pairing with a malicious RF controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
1 month ago
Wait, can he really inject code like that? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
1 month ago
Definitely a malicious reprogramming attack!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 month ago
Sounds like a classic command injection attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
2 months ago
I vaguely recall a practice question about abusing reprogramming attacks, but I’m not confident if that fits this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
2 months ago
I feel like re-pairing with a malicious RF controller could be a possibility too, but it seems more about intercepting signals than reprogramming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
2 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about command injection being related to sending unauthorized commands. Could that apply here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
2 months ago
I think this might be a malicious reprogramming attack since he’s modifying the firmware of the remote controllers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel