Eccouncil ECSAv10 Exam - Topic 5 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's ECSAv10 exam

Question #: 58
Topic #: 5

[All ECSAv10 Questions]

In which of the following IDS evasion techniques does IDS reject the packets that an end system accepts?

AIPS evasion technique

BIDS evasion technique

CUDP evasion technique

DTTL evasion technique

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Lezlie at Jul 08, 2023, 11:28 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ECSAv10 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jenelle

8 months ago

I thought it was a UDP evasion technique at first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dylan

8 months ago

Totally agree, IPS is the right answer!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

8 months ago

Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julie

8 months ago

I think it's actually an IDS evasion technique.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joni

9 months ago

It's definitely an IPS evasion technique.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elsa

9 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the differences between these techniques. I remember TTL being mentioned, but I can't recall how it fits in with packet acceptance.

upvoted 0 times

...

James

9 months ago

This question seems familiar; I think we had a practice question about packet rejection techniques. I might lean towards option A or B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leigha

9 months ago

I remember studying IDS evasion techniques, and I feel like option B could be the answer, but I could be mixing it up with something else.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephen

9 months ago

I think this might be related to how IPS works, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

9 months ago

Adding the firewall rule to allow TCP/8443 from the branch to HQ seems like a good step too. I'll make sure to consider that option as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cammy

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between microflows and macroflows. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

10 months ago

This seems like a straightforward risk management question. I'll carefully consider the options and go with the one that best addresses the high probability of data loss.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

1 year ago

This question is making me hungry. I could go for some IDS-friendly snacks right about now. Maybe some TTL-infused chips?

upvoted 0 times

Jules

1 year ago

D) TTL evasion technique

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorinda

1 year ago

C) UDP evasion technique

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

1 year ago

B) IDS evasion technique

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawnda

1 year ago

A) IPS evasion technique

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

1 year ago

UDP evasion? More like the packets are doing the moonwalk to avoid detection. I'm feeling confident about the TTL evasion option.

upvoted 0 times

Lashon

1 year ago

Leonardo: Exactly, it's like the packets are trying to sneak past the IDS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonardo

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, it's all about manipulating the Time To Live field to avoid detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacqueline

1 year ago

User 1: I agree, TTL evasion technique sounds like the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonja

1 year ago

IPS evasion? Nah, that's just the IPS being a party pooper. I'm going with the IDS evasion technique - the packets are clearly the ninjas here.

upvoted 0 times

Stephania

1 year ago

Definitely, let's go with IDS evasion technique, those packets are like ninjas.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jackie

1 year ago

Yeah, IPS evasion is too strict, IDS evasion is more flexible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenelle

1 year ago

IDS evasion technique sounds like the way to go, those packets are sneaky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hubert

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think it might be D) TTL evasion technique.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

1 year ago

I agree with Billye, IDS evasion technique makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Claudia

1 year ago

Aha! The correct answer must be TTL evasion. I bet the packets are playing hide-and-seek with the IDS by adjusting their time-to-live.

upvoted 0 times

Verlene

1 year ago

Yes, the packets try to evade detection by adjusting their time-to-live value.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margarett

1 year ago

I think you're right, TTL evasion technique sounds like the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Portia

1 year ago

Hmm, IDS evasion, huh? Sounds like a game of cat and mouse between the security system and the sneaky packets.

upvoted 0 times

Ettie

1 year ago

D) TTL evasion technique

upvoted 0 times

...

Matilda

1 year ago

C) UDP evasion technique

upvoted 0 times

...

Anastacia

1 year ago

B) IDS evasion technique

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

1 year ago

A) IPS evasion technique

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) IDS evasion technique.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karrie

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think it could also be A) IPS evasion technique, as intrusion prevention systems can also reject packets that bypass the IDS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clemencia

1 year ago

I agree with Kenny, because TTL evasion technique manipulates the time-to-live field in packets to avoid detection by IDS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

1 year ago

I think the answer is D) TTL evasion technique.

upvoted 0 times

...