Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

EC-Council ECSAv10 Exam - Topic 5 Question 58 Discussion

Posted by Lezlie on Jul 08, 2023 at 11:28 AM

In which of the following IDS evasion techniques does IDS reject the packets that an end system accepts?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium ECSAv10 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
JE
Jenelle 11 months ago
I thought it was a UDP evasion technique at first.
DY
Dylan 11 months ago
Totally agree, IPS is the right answer!
AS
Ashton 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds off.
JU
Julie 11 months ago
I think it's actually an IDS evasion technique.
JO
Joni 12 months ago
It's definitely an IPS evasion technique.
EL
Elsa 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between these techniques. I remember TTL being mentioned, but I can't recall how it fits in with packet acceptance.
JA
James 1 year ago
This question seems familiar; I think we had a practice question about packet rejection techniques. I might lean towards option A or B.
LE
Leigha 1 year ago
I remember studying IDS evasion techniques, and I feel like option B could be the answer, but I could be mixing it up with something else.
ST
Stephen 1 year ago
I think this might be related to how IPS works, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the right choice.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
Adding the firewall rule to allow TCP/8443 from the branch to HQ seems like a good step too. I'll make sure to consider that option as well.
CA
Cammy 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between microflows and macroflows. I'll have to think this through carefully.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward risk management question. I'll carefully consider the options and go with the one that best addresses the high probability of data loss.
CH
Cherelle 1 year ago
This question is making me hungry. I could go for some IDS-friendly snacks right about now. Maybe some TTL-infused chips?
JU
Jules 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherelle
D) TTL evasion technique
DO
Dorinda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherelle
C) UDP evasion technique
TE
Tegan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherelle
B) IDS evasion technique
LA
Lashawnda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherelle
A) IPS evasion technique
AL
Alline 1 year ago
UDP evasion? More like the packets are doing the moonwalk to avoid detection. I'm feeling confident about the TTL evasion option.
LA
Lashon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alline
Leonardo: Exactly, it's like the packets are trying to sneak past the IDS.
LE
Leonardo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alline
User 2: Yeah, it's all about manipulating the Time To Live field to avoid detection.
JA
Jacqueline 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alline
User 1: I agree, TTL evasion technique sounds like the way to go.
TO
Tonja 1 year ago
IPS evasion? Nah, that's just the IPS being a party pooper. I'm going with the IDS evasion technique - the packets are clearly the ninjas here.
ST
Stephania 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tonja
Definitely, let's go with IDS evasion technique, those packets are like ninjas.
JA
Jackie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tonja
Yeah, IPS evasion is too strict, IDS evasion is more flexible.
JE
Jenelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tonja
IDS evasion technique sounds like the way to go, those packets are sneaky.
HU
Hubert 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be D) TTL evasion technique.
RO
Roslyn 2 years ago
I agree with Billye, IDS evasion technique makes sense.
CL
Claudia 2 years ago
Aha! The correct answer must be TTL evasion. I bet the packets are playing hide-and-seek with the IDS by adjusting their time-to-live.
VE
Verlene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Claudia
Yes, the packets try to evade detection by adjusting their time-to-live value.
MA
Margarett 1 year ago
↳ replying to Claudia
I think you're right, TTL evasion technique sounds like the correct answer.
PO
Portia 2 years ago
Hmm, IDS evasion, huh? Sounds like a game of cat and mouse between the security system and the sneaky packets.
ET
Ettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Portia
D) TTL evasion technique
MA
Matilda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Portia
C) UDP evasion technique
AN
Anastacia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Portia
B) IDS evasion technique
AL
Alpha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Portia
A) IPS evasion technique
BI
Billye 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) IDS evasion technique.
KA
Karrie 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be A) IPS evasion technique, as intrusion prevention systems can also reject packets that bypass the IDS.
CL
Clemencia 2 years ago
I agree with Kenny, because TTL evasion technique manipulates the time-to-live field in packets to avoid detection by IDS.
KE
Kenny 2 years ago
I think the answer is D) TTL evasion technique.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel