MENU
Which of the following TCB techniques involves viewing system components at a high level and ignoring or segregating its specific details?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 312-76 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
GE
Georgene
11 months ago
I always get confused with these terms, but C sounds right to me.
MU
Muriel
11 months ago
Nah, it's definitely C. Can't ignore the details in a trusted system!
SH
Shawn
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought it might be A.
CA
Carmela
12 months ago
Totally agree, abstraction is all about high-level views!
AH
Ahmed
12 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C, Abstraction.
KI
Kindra
1 year ago
I keep mixing up trusted path and abstraction; I hope I remember the right one during the exam!
EL
Elenora
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like abstraction was definitely mentioned as a way to ignore specific details.
LE
Lettie
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about security perimeter being more about boundaries rather than abstraction.
PA
Paz
1 year ago
I think the answer might be C, Abstraction, since it relates to simplifying complex systems by focusing on high-level views.
HA
Halina
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is C. Abstraction is all about viewing things at a high level and not getting bogged down in the specifics. That seems to be what the question is asking for.
MA
Marsha
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. Abstraction is about simplifying complex systems by focusing on the big picture rather than the details. That sounds like the right approach here, so I'm going with C.
FR
France
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to be describing different security concepts, but I'm not totally clear on how they differ. I'll have to think this through carefully.
BA
Barrett
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems to be asking about a high-level approach to system components. I think the answer might be C, Abstraction, since that involves viewing things at a higher level and ignoring specific details.
TO
Toi
1 year ago
I remember learning about this in my accounting class. I think the correct answer is that capital expenses allow for the cost to be depreciated over time, while operating expenses do not. I'll double-check the options to be sure.
GL
Glenn
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. I need to figure out what the code is doing and how the different options might affect that.
AL
Alona
1 year ago
A hash table is definitely the way to go here. It's perfect for quickly looking up and summing the transaction amounts for each unique account number. I feel pretty confident about this one.
EZ
Ezekiel
1 year ago
I think it might be WSDL operations, but I'm not entirely sure.
MI
Mi
2 years ago
ThMit's Mi good point, Oliveut I still Oliveelieve Tamra) MiOlivestrMiTamration fits the desTamraription Oliveetter.
TA
Tamra
2 years ago
Oliveut Tamraouldn't it Milso Olivee D) Trusted pMith? I meMin, it's MiOliveout ensuring seTamraure TamraommuniTamraMition Oliveetween the user Mind the system.
OL
Olive
2 years ago
I Migree, when we use MiOlivestrMiction, we focus on the Oliveig picture insteMid of diving into specifics.
MI
Mi
3 years ago
I think the Minswer is C) MibstrMiction.