New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil 312-50 Exam - Topic 1 Question 114 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-50 exam
Question #: 114
Topic #: 1
[All 312-50 Questions]

The network team has well-established procedures to follow for creating new rules on the firewall. This includes having approval from a manager prior to implementing any new rules. While reviewing the firewall configuration, you notice a recently implemented rule but cannot locate manager approval for it. What would be a good step to have in the procedures for a situation like this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ashton
3 days ago
A documentation step is crucial, so A could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
8 days ago
But what if the rule is a security risk? Shouldn't we roll it back?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
13 days ago
Definitely agree with C. Rolling back could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
18 days ago
I think option C makes the most sense. Don't want to disrupt business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
24 days ago
Option C is just asking for a security breach. Gotta get that manager approval ASAP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
29 days ago
Haha, I bet the network team is sweating bullets over this one. Gotta love those unexpected firewall surprises!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
1 month ago
I agree, rolling it back is the safest bet. Better to be safe than sorry when it comes to firewall rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
1 month ago
I lean towards option D because it seems like the safest choice, but I worry about the potential impact on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
1 month ago
I think we had a practice question about monitoring traffic in a similar situation. It seems safer to keep an eye on it until we get approval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
2 months ago
I'm a little torn on this one. On one hand, we don't want to disrupt the business, but on the other, we have to follow the established procedures. I think I'd lean towards option C - try to get the approval quickly, but don't roll it back in the meantime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
2 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The procedures are clear - we need manager approval before implementing any new rules. Option D is the way to go - roll it back immediately and get that approval before putting it back in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
2 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key here is to balance the need for proper approval with the potential business impact. I'd say option C is the way to go - document the reason, but don't roll it back until we can get that manager sign-off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
2 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of documenting changes, but I'm not sure if that should be the first step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
3 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Can't have unapproved firewall rules, that's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
3 months ago
Surprised there's a rule without approval! How did that happen?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
3 months ago
Rolling back the rule might be risky if the business is using it. I feel like option C could be a good compromise, but I'm not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think option C might be the best approach - we don't want to disrupt any critical business processes, but we definitely need to get that manager approval as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like there could be a few different approaches, but I'm not sure which one would be the best step to take.
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
2 months ago
I think monitoring the traffic is a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel