Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 312-50 Exam - Topic 1 Question 114 Discussion

The network team has well-established procedures to follow for creating new rules on the firewall. This includes having approval from a manager prior to implementing any new rules. While reviewing the firewall configuration, you notice a recently implemented rule but cannot locate manager approval for it. What would be a good step to have in the procedures for a situation like this?
D) Immediately roll back the firewall rule until a manager can approve it
A) Have the network team document the reason why the rule was implemented without prior manager approval.
B) Monitor all traffic using the firewall rule until a manager can approve it.
C) Do not roll back the firewall rule as the business may be relying upon it, but try to get manager approval as soon as possible.

Eccouncil 312-50 Exam - Topic 1 Question 114 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-50 exam
Question #: 114
Topic #: 1
[All 312-50 Questions]

The network team has well-established procedures to follow for creating new rules on the firewall. This includes having approval from a manager prior to implementing any new rules. While reviewing the firewall configuration, you notice a recently implemented rule but cannot locate manager approval for it. What would be a good step to have in the procedures for a situation like this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Katlyn at Nov 21, 2025, 12:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-50 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Georgiana
3 months ago
Rolling back immediately could disrupt services. Option C is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
3 months ago
I feel like we should prioritize getting manager approval. Option C is a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
4 months ago
Monitoring traffic as in option B could help us assess the situation first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
4 months ago
Option A makes sense too. We need to document everything for future reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
4 months ago
I agree, but what if the rule is harmful? Option D seems safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
4 months ago
I think option C is best. We can't just roll it back without knowing the impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
5 months ago
A documentation step is crucial, so A could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
5 months ago
But what if the rule is a security risk? Shouldn't we roll it back?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
5 months ago
Definitely agree with C. Rolling back could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
5 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense. Don't want to disrupt business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
5 months ago
Option C is just asking for a security breach. Gotta get that manager approval ASAP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
6 months ago
Haha, I bet the network team is sweating bullets over this one. Gotta love those unexpected firewall surprises!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
6 months ago
I agree, rolling it back is the safest bet. Better to be safe than sorry when it comes to firewall rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
6 months ago
I lean towards option D because it seems like the safest choice, but I worry about the potential impact on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
6 months ago
I think we had a practice question about monitoring traffic in a similar situation. It seems safer to keep an eye on it until we get approval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
6 months ago
I'm a little torn on this one. On one hand, we don't want to disrupt the business, but on the other, we have to follow the established procedures. I think I'd lean towards option C - try to get the approval quickly, but don't roll it back in the meantime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
6 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The procedures are clear - we need manager approval before implementing any new rules. Option D is the way to go - roll it back immediately and get that approval before putting it back in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key here is to balance the need for proper approval with the potential business impact. I'd say option C is the way to go - document the reason, but don't roll it back until we can get that manager sign-off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
7 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of documenting changes, but I'm not sure if that should be the first step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
7 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Can't have unapproved firewall rules, that's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
7 months ago
Surprised there's a rule without approval! How did that happen?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
8 months ago
Rolling back the rule might be risky if the business is using it. I feel like option C could be a good compromise, but I'm not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think option C might be the best approach - we don't want to disrupt any critical business processes, but we definitely need to get that manager approval as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like there could be a few different approaches, but I'm not sure which one would be the best step to take.
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
2 months ago
Getting manager approval ASAP seems like the best move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
3 months ago
Documenting the reason could help clarify things later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
3 months ago
Rolling it back might be too risky if the business needs it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
3 months ago
But what if the rule is causing issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
7 months ago
I think monitoring the traffic is a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel