Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 312-39 Exam - Topic 2 Question 89 Discussion

An organization is implementing and deploying the SIEM with following capabilities.What kind of SIEM deployment architecture the organization is planning to implement?
B) Self-hosted, Jointly Managed
A) Cloud, MSSP Managed
C) Self-hosted, Self-Managed
D) Self-hosted, MSSP Managed

Eccouncil 312-39 Exam - Topic 2 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-39 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 2
[All 312-39 Questions]

An organization is implementing and deploying the SIEM with following capabilities.

What kind of SIEM deployment architecture the organization is planning to implement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

t/5a3187b4419202f0fb8b2dd1/1513195444728/Windows+Splunk+Logging+Cheat+Sheet+v2.2.pdf

by Cristal at Aug 28, 2024, 10:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-39 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Brittni
8 months ago
Surprised they didn't choose Self-hosted, Self-Managed for more control!
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
8 months ago
Wait, are they really trusting a third party with all that data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
8 months ago
I think Self-hosted, Jointly Managed could work better for control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
8 months ago
Totally agree, that's the way to go for scalability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
8 months ago
Looks like they're going for a Cloud, MSSP Managed setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
9 months ago
I studied the differences between these architectures, but I’m confused about whether they would prefer a fully self-managed option or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
9 months ago
I feel like Self-hosted, MSSP Managed could be a possibility too, but I can't recall the specifics of when to choose that over others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question about self-hosted solutions. Could it be Self-hosted, Jointly Managed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
9 months ago
I think the organization might be going for a Cloud, MSSP Managed option since it seems more scalable and less maintenance for them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
9 months ago
The image provides helpful context, but I'm still a bit unsure about the nuances between the deployment options. I'll make my best guess and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
9 months ago
This is a good test of my SIEM knowledge. I'll draw on what I've learned about cloud, self-hosted, and managed service models to select the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
9 months ago
Okay, the options cover different hosting and management models. I think I can eliminate a few based on the capabilities shown in the image.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
9 months ago
This looks like a straightforward SIEM deployment question. I'll carefully review the options and think through the key differences between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
9 months ago
Hmm, the image shows some SIEM capabilities, but I'm not sure how to connect that to the deployment architecture. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
9 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the key is getting the LIFs to fail over across subnets. I'm leaning towards option C, but I'll need to double-check the details on how VIP LIFs work with BGP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
10 months ago
Okay, I know the key Android components are Activity, Service, Content Provider, and Broadcast Receiver. I'll focus on those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
1 year ago
I bet the IT team is already fighting over who gets to be the 'self-managed' one. That's a tough job, but someone's gotta do it!
upvoted 0 times
Carisa
1 year ago
C) Self-hosted, Self-Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
1 year ago
B) Self-hosted, Jointly Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
1 year ago
A) Cloud, MSSP Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shay
1 year ago
MSSP managed SIEM? That could be a good option for organizations that want the benefits of a SIEM without the hassle of managing it themselves. Sounds like the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Rima
1 year ago
C) Self-hosted, Self-Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
1 year ago
B) Self-hosted, Jointly Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
1 year ago
A) Cloud, MSSP Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Boris
1 year ago
Self-hosted and self-managed? That's the old-school way, but I guess some organizations still prefer that level of control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
1 year ago
Self-hosted and jointly managed? Sounds like a lot of work, but maybe they have a good reason for that approach.
upvoted 0 times
Francine
1 year ago
D) Self-hosted, MSSP Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
1 year ago
C) Self-hosted, Self-Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 year ago
B) Self-hosted, Jointly Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
1 year ago
A) Cloud, MSSP Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
1 year ago
I believe self-hosted, MSSP managed SIEM would be a good option. It allows the organization to benefit from managed security services while still maintaining control over their data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 year ago
I agree with Lashaunda. Self-hosted, self-managed architecture gives the organization more control over their security data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
1 year ago
Hmm, the image suggests a cloud-based SIEM deployment, but the options don't seem to directly match that. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Rex
1 year ago
B) Self-hosted, Jointly Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
1 year ago
Hmm, the image does suggest a cloud-based SIEM deployment. Option A seems to be the closest match.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
A) Cloud, MSSP Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashaunda
1 year ago
I think the organization is planning to implement self-hosted, self-managed SIEM.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel