Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 312-39 Exam - Topic 2 Question 89 Discussion

An organization is implementing and deploying the SIEM with following capabilities.What kind of SIEM deployment architecture the organization is planning to implement?
B) Self-hosted, Jointly Managed
A) Cloud, MSSP Managed
C) Self-hosted, Self-Managed
D) Self-hosted, MSSP Managed

Eccouncil 312-39 Exam - Topic 2 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-39 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 2
[All 312-39 Questions]

An organization is implementing and deploying the SIEM with following capabilities.

What kind of SIEM deployment architecture the organization is planning to implement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

t/5a3187b4419202f0fb8b2dd1/1513195444728/Windows+Splunk+Logging+Cheat+Sheet+v2.2.pdf

by Cristal at Aug 28, 2024, 10:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-39 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Brittni
9 months ago
Surprised they didn't choose Self-hosted, Self-Managed for more control!
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
9 months ago
Wait, are they really trusting a third party with all that data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
10 months ago
I think Self-hosted, Jointly Managed could work better for control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
10 months ago
Totally agree, that's the way to go for scalability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
10 months ago
Looks like they're going for a Cloud, MSSP Managed setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
10 months ago
I studied the differences between these architectures, but I’m confused about whether they would prefer a fully self-managed option or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
11 months ago
I feel like Self-hosted, MSSP Managed could be a possibility too, but I can't recall the specifics of when to choose that over others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question about self-hosted solutions. Could it be Self-hosted, Jointly Managed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
11 months ago
I think the organization might be going for a Cloud, MSSP Managed option since it seems more scalable and less maintenance for them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
11 months ago
The image provides helpful context, but I'm still a bit unsure about the nuances between the deployment options. I'll make my best guess and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
11 months ago
This is a good test of my SIEM knowledge. I'll draw on what I've learned about cloud, self-hosted, and managed service models to select the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
11 months ago
Okay, the options cover different hosting and management models. I think I can eliminate a few based on the capabilities shown in the image.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
11 months ago
This looks like a straightforward SIEM deployment question. I'll carefully review the options and think through the key differences between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
11 months ago
Hmm, the image shows some SIEM capabilities, but I'm not sure how to connect that to the deployment architecture. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the key is getting the LIFs to fail over across subnets. I'm leaning towards option C, but I'll need to double-check the details on how VIP LIFs work with BGP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
11 months ago
Okay, I know the key Android components are Activity, Service, Content Provider, and Broadcast Receiver. I'll focus on those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
1 year ago
I bet the IT team is already fighting over who gets to be the 'self-managed' one. That's a tough job, but someone's gotta do it!
upvoted 0 times
Carisa
1 year ago
C) Self-hosted, Self-Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
1 year ago
B) Self-hosted, Jointly Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
1 year ago
A) Cloud, MSSP Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shay
1 year ago
MSSP managed SIEM? That could be a good option for organizations that want the benefits of a SIEM without the hassle of managing it themselves. Sounds like the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Rima
1 year ago
C) Self-hosted, Self-Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
1 year ago
B) Self-hosted, Jointly Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
1 year ago
A) Cloud, MSSP Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Boris
1 year ago
Self-hosted and self-managed? That's the old-school way, but I guess some organizations still prefer that level of control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
1 year ago
Self-hosted and jointly managed? Sounds like a lot of work, but maybe they have a good reason for that approach.
upvoted 0 times
Francine
1 year ago
D) Self-hosted, MSSP Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
1 year ago
C) Self-hosted, Self-Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 year ago
B) Self-hosted, Jointly Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
1 year ago
A) Cloud, MSSP Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
1 year ago
I believe self-hosted, MSSP managed SIEM would be a good option. It allows the organization to benefit from managed security services while still maintaining control over their data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 year ago
I agree with Lashaunda. Self-hosted, self-managed architecture gives the organization more control over their security data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
1 year ago
Hmm, the image suggests a cloud-based SIEM deployment, but the options don't seem to directly match that. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Rex
1 year ago
B) Self-hosted, Jointly Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
1 year ago
Hmm, the image does suggest a cloud-based SIEM deployment. Option A seems to be the closest match.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
A) Cloud, MSSP Managed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashaunda
1 year ago
I think the organization is planning to implement self-hosted, self-managed SIEM.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel