Which type of attack is used to hack an IoT device and direct large amounts of network traffic toward a web server, resulting in overloading the server with connections and preventing any new connections?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 312-38 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
14 comments · newest first
CH
Chun
12 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize DDoS was that effective against IoT!
SO
Sommer
12 months ago
I thought sniffing was more about data interception, not overload.
FL
Florinda
12 months ago
Wait, isn't XSS also a type of attack?
TA
Tamera
1 year ago
Agreed, it's all about overwhelming the server.
AS
Ashanti
1 year ago
Definitely a DDoS attack!
CA
Carri
1 year ago
I recall that DDoS attacks specifically target servers with massive traffic. This seems to fit the description perfectly!
PA
Paulina
1 year ago
DDoS sounds right, but I get confused with all the acronyms. I hope I remember the details correctly.
GR
Gracie
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like XSS is more about injecting scripts rather than traffic overload.
FA
Fairy
1 year ago
I think this might be a DDoS attack since it involves overwhelming a server with traffic. I remember practicing a similar question.
LI
Lilli
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the advantages of each approach and how they differ in terms of things like label stack size and path options.
GR
Graciela
1 year ago
Wait, is "closure" an actual alarm status? I'm a bit confused by that one. I'll need to double-check my understanding.
PA
Paris
1 year ago
The key here is that the chair manipulation is intended to influence the student's behavior, so I'd say it's an antecedent variable.
AL
Alyce
1 year ago
Didn't we discuss a similar question in practice where the oversubscription was key? I think it might be 64 sessions per IP here.
YA
Yasuko
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions ensuring an admin node is available, but it doesn't explicitly say it needs to be for policy configuration. I'm torn between A and D - I'll have to think this through carefully.