MENU
Stanley works as an incident responder at a top MNC based out of Singapore. He was asked to investigate a cybersecurity incident that recently occurred in the company.
While investigating the crime, he collected the evidence from the victim systems. He must present this evidence in a clear and comprehensible manner to the members of
jury so that the evidence explains the facts clearly and further helps in obtaining an expert opinion on the same to confirm the investigation process.
In the above scenario, what is the characteristic of the digital evidence Stanley tried to preserve?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 212-89 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
TO
Tonja
11 months ago
I think believable is important, but not as much as authentic.
DO
Dorathy
11 months ago
Surprised they didn't mention admissibility, that's crucial too!
LE
Lemuel
12 months ago
But isn't it also about being complete?
FR
Frank
12 months ago
I totally agree, authenticity is key!
NO
Noemi
1 year ago
Digital evidence needs to be authentic to hold up in court.
AL
Alexis
1 year ago
I keep thinking about how believable the evidence has to be. If the jury doesn't find it credible, it won't matter how complete or authentic it is.
EU
Eun
1 year ago
I feel like completeness is crucial too, especially when presenting to a jury. They need to see the whole picture, right?
CA
Callie
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the evidence also needs to be admissible in court. That might be a key characteristic Stanley should focus on.
AS
Asha
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of authenticity in digital evidence during our last class. It seems like that might be the right answer here.
MA
Marcelle
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I know mod_authz_core is related to authorization, but I'm not sure I fully understand how the Require directive works in this context. I'll need to review my notes and the module documentation to make sure I select the right options.
ER
Erinn
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review my networking notes before answering.
GE
Gerardo
1 year ago
Using a local variable could be a good option, but I'm not sure if that's the "best" method as the question asks. I'll have to review my notes and think about the pros and cons of each approach.
LE
Leota
1 year ago
I feel like I saw a practice question about losses from purchase commitments, and it seemed like that one might have some exceptions too... but I'm not entirely certain.
CR
Cruz
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different infrastructure components and which ones would use Linux.
CA
Carin
1 year ago
I'm with Marica on this one. If the evidence isn't believable, it's not going to be much help in court, no matter how authentic or admissible it is. Stanley needs to make sure the jury can understand and trust the digital evidence.
DI
Dick
1 year ago
Yes, admissibility is also crucial for the digital evidence to be considered valid in court.
FR
Francisca
1 year ago
D) Admissible
MA
Marylou
1 year ago
I agree, the evidence needs to be both believable and authentic for it to be useful in court.
JO
Joanne
1 year ago
C) Authentic
LI
Lindsey
1 year ago
A) Believable
MA
Marica
1 year ago
Haha, I bet Stanley wishes he had a time machine to go back and preserve the evidence before the incident even happened! But in all seriousness, I think the answer is A) Believable.
PA
Pansy
1 year ago
Gwen: That's true, having both believable and complete evidence is essential in this case.
ED
Edward
1 year ago
User 3: Complete evidence would also be crucial for a thorough investigation.
GW
Gwen
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, it's important for the evidence to be believable in order to support the investigation.
CR
Crissy
1 year ago
User 1: I think the characteristic of the digital evidence Stanley tried to preserve is A) Believable.
RO
Ronny
1 year ago
You might be right, but I still think it is A) Believable.
BO
Bonita
1 year ago
Actually, I think it is D) Admissible.
VA
Val
1 year ago
No, I believe it is B) Complete.
AL
Alisha
1 year ago
I think the characteristic of the digital evidence Stanley tried to preserve is C) Authentic.
ST
Stefania
1 year ago
I'm going with B) Complete. Stanley should have collected all the relevant data to provide a comprehensive picture of the incident, leaving no gaps in the investigation.
SU
Sunny
1 year ago
B) Complete
MA
Maile
1 year ago
A) Believable
LO
Lottie
2 years ago
I'd say C) Authentic. The key is to demonstrate that the evidence has not been tampered with and accurately reflects the cybersecurity incident.
CR
Craig
2 years ago
Yes, authenticity ensures that the evidence can be trusted and relied upon in court. It's important for a successful investigation.
CH
Chandra
2 years ago
Definitely D) Admissible. Stanley needs to ensure the evidence is legally acceptable in court, so it's all about preserving the integrity and authenticity of the digital evidence.
HE
Helga
1 year ago
D) Admissible
WI
Willodean
1 year ago
C) Authentic
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
B) Complete
GE
Gertude
1 year ago
A) Believable
CA
Candra
2 years ago
I agree with Rex. Authenticity is crucial in preserving digital evidence for investigation purposes.
RE
Rex
2 years ago
I think the characteristic of the digital evidence Stanley tried to preserve is authenticity.