Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 212-89 Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Stanley works as an incident responder at a top MNC based out of Singapore. He was asked to investigate a cybersecurity incident that recently occurred in the company.While investigating the crime, he collected the evidence from the victim systems. He must present this evidence in a clear and comprehensible manner to the members ofjury so that the evidence explains the facts clearly and further helps in obtaining an expert opinion on the same to confirm the investigation process.In the above scenario, what is the characteristic of the digital evidence Stanley tried to preserve?
A) Believable
B) Complete
C) Authentic
D) Admissible

Eccouncil 212-89 Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-89 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 1
[All 212-89 Questions]

Stanley works as an incident responder at a top MNC based out of Singapore. He was asked to investigate a cybersecurity incident that recently occurred in the company.

While investigating the crime, he collected the evidence from the victim systems. He must present this evidence in a clear and comprehensible manner to the members of

jury so that the evidence explains the facts clearly and further helps in obtaining an expert opinion on the same to confirm the investigation process.

In the above scenario, what is the characteristic of the digital evidence Stanley tried to preserve?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Yvonne at Dec 07, 2022, 12:56 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 212-89 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tonja
8 months ago
I think believable is important, but not as much as authentic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
8 months ago
Surprised they didn't mention admissibility, that's crucial too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
9 months ago
But isn't it also about being complete?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
9 months ago
I totally agree, authenticity is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
9 months ago
Digital evidence needs to be authentic to hold up in court.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
9 months ago
I keep thinking about how believable the evidence has to be. If the jury doesn't find it credible, it won't matter how complete or authentic it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
9 months ago
I feel like completeness is crucial too, especially when presenting to a jury. They need to see the whole picture, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the evidence also needs to be admissible in court. That might be a key characteristic Stanley should focus on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
9 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of authenticity in digital evidence during our last class. It seems like that might be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
10 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I know mod_authz_core is related to authorization, but I'm not sure I fully understand how the Require directive works in this context. I'll need to review my notes and the module documentation to make sure I select the right options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review my networking notes before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
10 months ago
Using a local variable could be a good option, but I'm not sure if that's the "best" method as the question asks. I'll have to review my notes and think about the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
I feel like I saw a practice question about losses from purchase commitments, and it seemed like that one might have some exceptions too... but I'm not entirely certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different infrastructure components and which ones would use Linux.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
1 year ago
I'm with Marica on this one. If the evidence isn't believable, it's not going to be much help in court, no matter how authentic or admissible it is. Stanley needs to make sure the jury can understand and trust the digital evidence.
upvoted 0 times
Dick
1 year ago
Yes, admissibility is also crucial for the digital evidence to be considered valid in court.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
1 year ago
D) Admissible
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
1 year ago
I agree, the evidence needs to be both believable and authentic for it to be useful in court.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
1 year ago
C) Authentic
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
A) Believable
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marica
1 year ago
Haha, I bet Stanley wishes he had a time machine to go back and preserve the evidence before the incident even happened! But in all seriousness, I think the answer is A) Believable.
upvoted 0 times
Pansy
1 year ago
Gwen: That's true, having both believable and complete evidence is essential in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
1 year ago
User 3: Complete evidence would also be crucial for a thorough investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, it's important for the evidence to be believable in order to support the investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
1 year ago
User 1: I think the characteristic of the digital evidence Stanley tried to preserve is A) Believable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
1 year ago
You might be right, but I still think it is A) Believable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
1 year ago
Actually, I think it is D) Admissible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
1 year ago
No, I believe it is B) Complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
1 year ago
I think the characteristic of the digital evidence Stanley tried to preserve is C) Authentic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
1 year ago
I'm going with B) Complete. Stanley should have collected all the relevant data to provide a comprehensive picture of the incident, leaving no gaps in the investigation.
upvoted 0 times
Sunny
1 year ago
B) Complete
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
1 year ago
A) Believable
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lottie
1 year ago
I'd say C) Authentic. The key is to demonstrate that the evidence has not been tampered with and accurately reflects the cybersecurity incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
1 year ago
Yes, authenticity ensures that the evidence can be trusted and relied upon in court. It's important for a successful investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
1 year ago
Definitely D) Admissible. Stanley needs to ensure the evidence is legally acceptable in court, so it's all about preserving the integrity and authenticity of the digital evidence.
upvoted 0 times
Helga
1 year ago
D) Admissible
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 year ago
C) Authentic
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
B) Complete
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
1 year ago
A) Believable
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candra
1 year ago
I agree with Rex. Authenticity is crucial in preserving digital evidence for investigation purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
1 year ago
I think the characteristic of the digital evidence Stanley tried to preserve is authenticity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel